morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(13) limóne ‘lemon’<br />
farína ‘flour’<br />
Otherwise, there are good reasons to consider that the weight of the penult determines in most<br />
cases the locus of stress:<br />
(14)<br />
'L / 'H<br />
A frequently discussed issue is whether verbs should be considered as having the same stress<br />
pattern as nouns and adjectives or not (cf. Roca 1999, Krämer to appear). Here I consider that<br />
verbs do not behave differently from nouns and adjectives as far as stress is concerned. There<br />
are only 9 cases (out of 48) in the paradigm where stress is relatively ‘free’, and only for –are<br />
verbs:<br />
(15)<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
Pres. Ind. cómplico cómplichi cómplica complichiámo complicáte cómplicano<br />
fatíco fatíchi fatíca fatichiámo faticáte fatícano<br />
Pres. Subj. cómplichi cómplichi cómplichi complichiámo complichiáte cómplichino<br />
fatíchi fatíchi fatíchi fatichiámo fatichiáte fatíchino<br />
Imperative cómplica<br />
fatíca<br />
faticare = ‘labour’<br />
complicare = ‘complicate’<br />
Cf. data from Kenstowicz & Zuraw (2002) on a corpus of some 1.500 verbs of this type:<br />
Penult<br />
closed Open<br />
paroxytons 963 307<br />
proparoxytons 0 251<br />
In general, verbs derived from nouns / adjectives by prefixation or coversion conserve the<br />
stress of their base:<br />
(16) rótolo arrótolo<br />
‘roll’ ‘roll up-1 SG PRES IND’<br />
caténa incaténo<br />
‘chain’ ‘chain-1 SG PRES IND’<br />
teléfono teléfono<br />
‘telephone’ ‘phone-1 SG PRES IND’<br />
Why is the proparoxytonic pattern the non marked one for L words? We cannot really rely<br />
on the existing lexicon or on words resembling to existing ones. However, some facts support<br />
this view.<br />
124