22.06.2013 Views

morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2 Previous analyses<br />

Various proposals have been put forward in the literature in order to account for constructions<br />

with non-finite verb forms that exhibit verbal as well as nominal properties, such as the Spanish<br />

nominal infinitive or the English gerund.<br />

• Lexical category change by affixation<br />

• Lexical category change in syntax<br />

• Dual categorial status: Syntactic projection of two heads<br />

• Dual categorial status: Insertion into both V an N is possible<br />

4.2.1 Lexical category change by affixation<br />

A kind of analysis that is immediately plausible to many morphologists is the following:<br />

• The English gerund or the Spanish infinitive is a verb<br />

• Where it has the distribution of a noun, it must have undergone a change in lexical<br />

category.<br />

• A change in lexical category can be brought about by overt affixation, or by zero affixes.<br />

English gerund<br />

• The overt affix -ing may be attached to V°, VP or IP, changing the category to N, giving<br />

rise to the different gerundive constructions in English (Jackendoff 1977, Baker<br />

1985, Abney 1987)<br />

Spanish infinitive<br />

• Lexical category change by phrasal affixation of zero affixes at the level of V°, VP,<br />

and IP/CP (Yoon & Bonet-Farran 1991)<br />

NP → VP-∅<br />

IP → IP-∅<br />

A similar proposal is made by de Miguel (1996), who distinguishes between two infinitival<br />

affixes in Spanish<br />

• -r as an inflectional affix that does not change the category of the verbal root<br />

• -r as a derivational affix, converting a verb into a noun<br />

Crucial presupposition of de Miguel's (1996) analysis<br />

• infinitives preceded by determiners are either fully verbal or fully nominal, but cannot<br />

have verbal and nominal properties at the same time (counterexamples: (13), (14),<br />

(34), (35))<br />

Problem<br />

• does not explain why fully verbal infinitives can be preceded by a determiner<br />

Note<br />

• There is no overt affix in Spanish infinitives that could change the lexical category (in<br />

contrast to English gerund)<br />

• Postulation of a zero-affix or of affix homonymy is necessary<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!