morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.2 Previous analyses<br />
Various proposals have been put forward in the literature in order to account for constructions<br />
with non-finite verb forms that exhibit verbal as well as nominal properties, such as the Spanish<br />
nominal infinitive or the English gerund.<br />
• Lexical category change by affixation<br />
• Lexical category change in syntax<br />
• Dual categorial status: Syntactic projection of two heads<br />
• Dual categorial status: Insertion into both V an N is possible<br />
4.2.1 Lexical category change by affixation<br />
A kind of analysis that is immediately plausible to many morphologists is the following:<br />
• The English gerund or the Spanish infinitive is a verb<br />
• Where it has the distribution of a noun, it must have undergone a change in lexical<br />
category.<br />
• A change in lexical category can be brought about by overt affixation, or by zero affixes.<br />
English gerund<br />
• The overt affix -ing may be attached to V°, VP or IP, changing the category to N, giving<br />
rise to the different gerundive constructions in English (Jackendoff 1977, Baker<br />
1985, Abney 1987)<br />
Spanish infinitive<br />
• Lexical category change by phrasal affixation of zero affixes at the level of V°, VP,<br />
and IP/CP (Yoon & Bonet-Farran 1991)<br />
NP → VP-∅<br />
IP → IP-∅<br />
A similar proposal is made by de Miguel (1996), who distinguishes between two infinitival<br />
affixes in Spanish<br />
• -r as an inflectional affix that does not change the category of the verbal root<br />
• -r as a derivational affix, converting a verb into a noun<br />
Crucial presupposition of de Miguel's (1996) analysis<br />
• infinitives preceded by determiners are either fully verbal or fully nominal, but cannot<br />
have verbal and nominal properties at the same time (counterexamples: (13), (14),<br />
(34), (35))<br />
Problem<br />
• does not explain why fully verbal infinitives can be preceded by a determiner<br />
Note<br />
• There is no overt affix in Spanish infinitives that could change the lexical category (in<br />
contrast to English gerund)<br />
• Postulation of a zero-affix or of affix homonymy is necessary<br />
113