morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz

e. in the first and third person singular stress falls onto the ‘stem’ (anduv-e/-o vs.
*anduv-é/-ó, estuv-e/-o vs. *estuv-é/-ó, sup-e/-o vs. *sup-é/-ó, dij-e/-o vs. *dij-é/-ó)
whereas in the regular inflection the endings are stressed (e.g. cant-é/-ó, and beb-í/
-ió).
(47) HYPOTHESIS: Depending on the features encoded under T° the element /ub/ is inserted
in the root and(ar). Once /ub/ is inserted, it triggers all the other alternations, i.e. the
conjugation class neutralisation, the ‘stress shift’, and the irregular theme vowel
realisation are all a consequence of the /ub/-extension.
(48) /ub/-extension (provisional)
Ø → /ub/ / √ ___ U4 (√ = andar)
(49) Derivation (provisional)
Syntax √/and/ v° T°/φ
[R_S], [+perf]
[2pl]
MS √/and/ v° Th T°/φ
[R_S], [+perf]
[2pl]
Redundancy Rule (31)a and-α
Realization of Th (39)d and-α a
Realization of T°/ and-α a mos
After VI /andamos/
Readjustment Rule (48) Ø → /ub/ / √ ___ U4 (√ = andar)
Output */andubamos/
(50) a. Contrary to Embick & Halle (2004), I assume that Readjustment Rules may apply
before Vocabulary Insertion take place.
b. The „new“ element (in this case /ub/) has conjugation class features ([+α]) which
determines the realization of v°-Th.
(51) /ub/-extension (provisional)
Ø → /ub/+α / √ ___ U4 (√ = andar)
(52) a. anduviste
Syntax √/and/ v° T°/φ
[R_S], [perf]
[2sg]
MS √/and/ v° Th T°/φ
[R_S], [perf]
[2sg]
and
/ub/+α-extension andub+α
Redundancy Rule andub+α-β
Realization of Th andub+α-β i
Realization of φ andub+α-β i ste
Output /andubiste/
207