morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
morphological? - KOPS - Universität Konstanz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Lexical /i/ appeared as [i] in none of the 10 words where it was preceded by an<br />
unvoiced consonant. In this context it was always [j].<br />
• In 15 out of the 20 words where lexical /i/ was preceded by a consonant with<br />
the features [voiced] or [sonorant], between 100% and 7.7 % showed /i/<br />
preserved as [i]. (The 100% case has a branching onset.)<br />
Table 2: The [i] vs. [j] variation in the collected data<br />
Features of preceding consonant Realization of lexical /i/ as [i] in %<br />
neither [voiced] nor [sonorant] 0<br />
[voiced] or [sonorant] 100 - 7.7, ø 47.2<br />
To illustrate the results of this pilot study, we give two examples, It. ardesia ‘slate’,<br />
and radicchio ‘radish’.<br />
(17) ardesia<br />
Observed realizations: [ar."dE….zi.a] (61.5 %) [ar."dE….zja] (38.5 %)<br />
Lexical representation: /ar.dE.zi.a/<br />
Preceding consonant: [voiced]<br />
Gliding predicted: optional<br />
Stress assignment: rule based: light penultima, stress on ante-penultima<br />
(18) radicchio<br />
Observed realizations: [ra."dik.kjo] (100 %)<br />
Lexical representation: /ra.dik.ki.o/<br />
Preceding consonant: neither [voiced] nor [sonorant]<br />
Gliding predicted: obligatory<br />
Stress assignment: rule based: light penultima, stress on ante-penultima<br />
To conclude this section, the following can be said: The general assumption that stress<br />
is assigned at the level of lexical representations has been combined with more<br />
specific assumptions about how directly observable glides are lexically represented<br />
and how they vary post-lexically. Our little empirical study has given support to the<br />
assumption that, at the level of lexical representations, all post-consonantal glides are<br />
vowels, which are the nuclei of light syllables. This has the consequence that many<br />
words that have directly observable penultimate, i.e. irregular stress, have underlying<br />
ante-penultimate, i.e. regular stress. Thus one obstacle to the ongoing quantitative<br />
analysis of the vocabulary has been eliminated.<br />
References:<br />
CANEPARI, Luciano (1980). Italiano Standard e Pronunce Regionali. Padova: Cleup.<br />
CHIERCHIA, Gennaro (1983/1986). “Length, Syllabification and the Phonological<br />
Cycle in Italian.” In: Journal of Italian Linguistics. 8.5-34.<br />
COLOMBO, Lucia (1992). Lexical Stress Effect and Its Interaction With Frequency in<br />
Word Pronunciation. In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception<br />
and Performance Vol. 18, No. 4:987-1003<br />
D'IMPERIO, Mariapaola and ROSENTHALL, Sam (1999). “Phonetics and phonology of<br />
main stress in Italian.” In: Phonology 16:1-28.<br />
LAUDANNA, Alessandro, BURANI, Cristina, CERMELE, Antonella und PARISI,<br />
223