30.06.2013 Views

Introduction to Health Physics: Fourth Edition - Ruang Baca FMIPA UB

Introduction to Health Physics: Fourth Edition - Ruang Baca FMIPA UB

Introduction to Health Physics: Fourth Edition - Ruang Baca FMIPA UB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Solution<br />

HEALTH PHYSICS INSTRUMENTATION 479<br />

Substituting the values for I1 = 0.88, I2 = 0.11, and d1 = 1 in<strong>to</strong> Eq. (9.22), we<br />

have<br />

0.88<br />

0.11 = d2 2<br />

1 2<br />

d2 = 2.83 m.<br />

When applied <strong>to</strong> a point source (for practical purposes, a real source approximates<br />

a “point” at distances from the source greater than 10 times the longest linear<br />

dimension of the source) the inverse square law is strictly applicable only in a free<br />

field, that is, in a field where there is no scattered radiation that can reach the detec<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

If there is significant scattered radiation, then the fall-off of radiation intensity<br />

with distance will be less than that predicted by the inverse square law. Allowance<br />

for the scatter can be made in several ways. One method is <strong>to</strong> measure the radiation<br />

at various distances from the calibration source with another calibrated instrument,<br />

then plot the radiation level versus distance on log–log paper and calculate the slope<br />

of the line. For example, if the slope is found <strong>to</strong> be –1.8, then instead of an inverse<br />

square relationship, we have<br />

I1<br />

I2<br />

= d1.8 2<br />

d1.8 1<br />

.<br />

Under this condition, d2, the distance from the source in Example 9.9, would be<br />

3.19 m.<br />

Another method for accounting for scattered radiation is <strong>to</strong> make two measurements<br />

at each calibration distance. One measurement is made with the detec<strong>to</strong>r in<br />

the radiation beam, and the second reading is made with the direct beam blocked<br />

out by a thick piece of lead, whose cross section is that of the detec<strong>to</strong>r, placed midway<br />

between the detec<strong>to</strong>r and the source. The difference between the two readings is<br />

due <strong>to</strong> the scattered radiation, and the appropriate correction can be made. When<br />

properly calibrated, a gamma- or X-ray survey meter should measure the radiation<br />

within ±10% about 95 times out of 100 measurements.<br />

Beta Particles<br />

Dose–response characteristics of most portable survey instruments for beta particles<br />

are strongly energy dependent. As a consequence, survey instruments are used<br />

mainly <strong>to</strong> detect beta radiation rather than <strong>to</strong> quantify the beta-radiation dose rate.<br />

Such instruments are therefore not usually calibrated for beta dose. For those cases<br />

where beta calibration is desired, sources of various surface areas are commercially<br />

available. These sources, whose calibration is traceable <strong>to</strong> the NIST, may be calibrated<br />

in transformations per minute per square centimeter for use in contamination moni<strong>to</strong>ring<br />

or in microsieverts per hour or millirems per hour at the surface and at several<br />

distances above the surface. In external dosimetry, we are not concerned with measuring<br />

dose from beta particles whose energy is less than 70 keV, because the range

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!