30.06.2013 Views

Introduction to Health Physics: Fourth Edition - Ruang Baca FMIPA UB

Introduction to Health Physics: Fourth Edition - Ruang Baca FMIPA UB

Introduction to Health Physics: Fourth Edition - Ruang Baca FMIPA UB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

560 CHAPTER 10<br />

Table 10-7 lists the first TVL, TVL1, and the equilibrium TVL, TVLe, for concrete,<br />

steel, and lead for various primary-beam quantum energies. The TVL1 differs from<br />

TVLe in order <strong>to</strong> account for changes in the spectral distribution of the radiation as<br />

it penetrates the shielding barrier. In Table 10-7, we find TVL1 <strong>to</strong> be 37-cm concrete,<br />

and TVLe <strong>to</strong> be 33-cm concrete. The required thickness of concrete is<br />

t barrier = TVL1 + (n − 1)TVLe<br />

t barrier = 37 cm + (5.0 − 1) × 33 cm = 169 cm(66.5in.)<br />

(10.31)<br />

Now we must see whether this barrier thickness meets the TADR limit of 20 × 10−6 Sv<br />

in 1 week (2 mrems in 1 week). The maximum IDR at the dose point, with the<br />

calculated transmission fac<strong>to</strong>r of 7.2 × 10−6 is calculated as follows:<br />

600<br />

IDR =<br />

Sv<br />

h × 9.92 × 10−6 × (1m) 2<br />

(6.3m) 2<br />

−4 Sv<br />

= 1.5 × 10<br />

h .<br />

When we substitute this value in<strong>to</strong> Eq. (10.28), we have<br />

IDR<br />

RW =<br />

Sv Gy<br />

× Wpri × Upri<br />

h wk<br />

Gy<br />

˙D0<br />

=<br />

h<br />

−4 Sv Gy<br />

1.5 × 10 × 800 × 0.5<br />

h wk<br />

600 Gy<br />

−6 Sv Sv<br />

= 100 × 10 = 100 μ<br />

wk wk .<br />

h<br />

This TADR is five times greater than the required value of 20 μSv/wk. Increasing<br />

the thickness of the concrete barrier by 3 HVLs (1 TVL = 3.3 HVL) would decrease<br />

the TADR <strong>to</strong> 12.5 μSv/wk, which is reasonably conservative and would allow for an<br />

increased utilization of the facility. If we choose <strong>to</strong> do this, then the barrier thickness<br />

would be<br />

33 cm<br />

t barrier = 165 cm + 3 HVL ×<br />

TVL<br />

= 195 cm.<br />

3.3 HVL<br />

TVL<br />

Since the primary barrier is much thicker than the other walls, which shield the<br />

secondary (scatter and leakage) radiation, the width of the primary barrier is usually<br />

restricted <strong>to</strong> one that is functionally effective. Good design practice specifies that the<br />

width of the primary barrier must be greater by at least 30.5 cm (1 ft.) on each side<br />

of the maximum-sized projection of the primary beam on the barrier (Fig. 10-21).<br />

That is, its width is 61 cm (2 ft.) greater than the projection of the primary beam<br />

at its greatest possible size. The widest possible beam projection occurs when the<br />

collima<strong>to</strong>r is rotated by 45◦ . Since the diagonal of a square is equal <strong>to</strong> 1.414 × length<br />

of the side, and the length of the projected side is given by<br />

s1 cm<br />

d1<br />

= s2 cm<br />

,<br />

d2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!