30.06.2013 Views

Introduction to Health Physics: Fourth Edition - Ruang Baca FMIPA UB

Introduction to Health Physics: Fourth Edition - Ruang Baca FMIPA UB

Introduction to Health Physics: Fourth Edition - Ruang Baca FMIPA UB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

590 CHAPTER 11<br />

Laundering contaminated protective equipment is a complex operation. It requires<br />

knowledge of the mechanisms of cleaning and of the effects of the cleaning<br />

agents on the composition and construction of the protective clothing. For most<br />

iso<strong>to</strong>pe labora<strong>to</strong>ries, the simplest method for dealing with contaminated protective<br />

clothing is <strong>to</strong> rent the protective clothing from a commercial supplier and <strong>to</strong> return<br />

the contaminated clothing <strong>to</strong> the supplier. For those installations that do their<br />

own laundry, ordinary laundering procedures, using sodium hexa-meta-phosphate<br />

or sodium ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid (Na-EDTA) added <strong>to</strong> the wash water<br />

may facilitate the removal of the contaminants. After laundering, the protective<br />

clothing should be moni<strong>to</strong>red <strong>to</strong> ascertain that it has, in fact, been decontaminated<br />

<strong>to</strong> some previously determined limit. If a piece of protective clothing is unusually<br />

or very severely contaminated, it may be simpler <strong>to</strong> dispose of the item as low-level<br />

radioactive waste (LLRW) rather than <strong>to</strong> try <strong>to</strong> decontaminate it. Unless the wash<br />

water meets regula<strong>to</strong>ry requirements for discharge in<strong>to</strong> the sanitary sewer system<br />

(such as 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 3), it must be treated as LLRW.<br />

Control of the Worker: Respira<strong>to</strong>ry Protection<br />

When a worker is likely <strong>to</strong> be exposed <strong>to</strong> airborne radioactivity, respira<strong>to</strong>ry protection<br />

must be considered. According <strong>to</strong> as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)<br />

requirements, the sum of the internal and external doses must be minimized. Wearing<br />

a respira<strong>to</strong>r decreases a worker’s efficiency by about 20–25%. Thus, if exposure<br />

<strong>to</strong> airborne radioactivity occurs simultaneously with external radiation exposure, an<br />

ALARA-based decision must be made regarding the use of a respira<strong>to</strong>ry protective<br />

device, as explained in Chapter 8.<br />

Medical Assessment<br />

It must be strongly emphasized that a worker must be medically approved for respira<strong>to</strong>r<br />

use before being allowed <strong>to</strong> put on a respira<strong>to</strong>r or being fitted for one.<br />

Wearing a respira<strong>to</strong>r effectively increases the volume of the upper respira<strong>to</strong>ry tract,<br />

thereby decreasing the volume of air that reaches the deep respira<strong>to</strong>ry tract (where<br />

gas exchange occurs). To compensate for this decreased air supply, the body’s homeostatic<br />

mechanisms increase the respira<strong>to</strong>ry rate and the rate of blood flow through<br />

the lungs. These rate increases lead <strong>to</strong> increased demands on the heart muscle. If<br />

the worker’s cardiovascular and respira<strong>to</strong>ry systems are in good health, then these<br />

increased cardiac demands are safely met. On the other hand, if the worker has<br />

an impaired cardiovascular system, the heart may not be capable of meeting this<br />

increased demand and a heart attack may ensue. For this reason, a worker who may<br />

have <strong>to</strong> wear a respira<strong>to</strong>r on the job must be tested and approved for respira<strong>to</strong>r use<br />

by a qualified physician before he or she is allowed <strong>to</strong> use a respira<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

Respira<strong>to</strong>ry Protective Devices<br />

The exact type of respira<strong>to</strong>ry protective device that may be required depends on<br />

the nature of the airborne contaminant. Respira<strong>to</strong>ry protective devices may be used only<br />

for those hazards for which they are designed. Half-mask or full-mask facepieces must<br />

not leak and must fit properly. Accordingly, the wearer of a respira<strong>to</strong>r must be fittested<br />

before a respira<strong>to</strong>r is assigned. Respira<strong>to</strong>ry protective devices for radiological<br />

protection may be classified in<strong>to</strong> several major categories, as shown in Table 11-3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!