Winning Research Skills - Westlaw
Winning Research Skills - Westlaw
Winning Research Skills - Westlaw
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2<br />
■ Where the official reporter is published by a government agency and an unofficial reporter is<br />
published by a commercial publisher such as West, the unofficial reporter may be more<br />
current. For a very recent case, therefore, an unofficial citation may be the only one available.<br />
■ Students and attorneys often prefer to use a West reporter even when it is not the official<br />
reporter because West editorial enhancements (e.g., case synopses, headnotes, and topic and<br />
key number indexing) enable them to work more efficiently.<br />
Unreported Opinions<br />
You may be surprised to learn that the great majority of federal and state judicial opinions are<br />
not reported at all. Sometimes an opinion is not reported because the court deems it redundant<br />
of previous decisions; other opinions are not reported because they are determined to lack<br />
precedential value. Court rules in each jurisdiction indicate when reporting of an opinion is<br />
necessary or desirable, and the rules vary among jurisdictions. Nearly all the decisions of courts<br />
of last resort within the state and federal system are reported in full.<br />
Most state trial-level cases are not reported. In fact, most trial court actions do not produce a<br />
written opinion at all. Trial transcripts and documents filed with the clerk of court make up a<br />
record of the action. These materials may be available as public records, but they are rarely<br />
published.<br />
A very high percentage of federal district court opinions are not reported. In fact, not all federal<br />
appellate cases are reported. The trend has been to report fewer opinions on a percentage basis.<br />
Because the absolute number of cases being decided continues to rise, however, a large number<br />
of opinions are reported.<br />
Many opinions not designated for inclusion in the reporters are nevertheless available online and<br />
in print sources, such as West’s Federal Appendix. There has been much debate in legal circles as<br />
to whether unreported opinions can serve as precedent; that is, whether they can be cited as<br />
authority. Some jurisdictions permitted citation of unreported opinions, while other permitted<br />
citation only in limited circumstances or prohibited it entirely. In April 2006, the U.S. Supreme<br />
Court adopted Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1, which provides that unpublished<br />
federal judicial opinions, orders, judgments, or other written dispositions issued on or after<br />
January 1, 2007, may be cited in the federal courts. The courts are free to decide the precedential<br />
weight of the unpublished decisions, but they may not prohibit their citation.<br />
Even when they have no or limited precedential authority, unreported opinions can help you<br />
understand an issue and determine judicial thinking. If you are going before Judge Smith in a<br />
products liability case, for example, it may be valuable to know what Judge Smith has done<br />
before in similar cases. It may also be useful to know what parties have been involved in prior<br />
litigation and what arguments were considered. In law school and in practice, unreported cases<br />
have many uses.<br />
Organization of Cases<br />
Cases reported by West are organized by court, jurisdiction, or geographic proximity. The<br />
arrangement of cases is determined by West attorney-editors. For example, in a regional reporter<br />
(a reporter that includes decisions from the courts of a particular region composed of several<br />
states) cases from a particular state are grouped together. The arrangement of a state’s cases in a<br />
10 <strong>Winning</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Skills</strong>