23.07.2013 Views

A CONSPECTUS OF THE LICHEN GENUS STEREOCAULON ...

A CONSPECTUS OF THE LICHEN GENUS STEREOCAULON ...

A CONSPECTUS OF THE LICHEN GENUS STEREOCAULON ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

land".<br />

I. MACKENZ~E LAMB: A Conspectus of Stereocaulon<br />

St. corallinum c. stigmateum RABENH.<br />

Deutschlands Kryptogamen-Flora, 2, 1. Abt., Lichenen: 112 (1845).<br />

Typus: Switzerland, Susten, leg. SCHAERER; not seen by us. The description, "mit<br />

schwarz punktirten, kornigen Schuppchen", indicates a state infested by a parasymbiontic<br />

fungus. To be rejected (Int. Code Art. 70).<br />

"Stereocaulon globosus (HuDs.) VAIN."<br />

This name is given to nos. 27 and 87 of ANDERS'S exsiccat Lich. EXS. Bohem. Bor. The<br />

former is St. saxatile MAGN., the latter a mixture of St. evolutum GRAEWE and St. tomentosum<br />

var. compactum FREY. The combination is not mentioned in ANDERS'S book (1928), and<br />

we cannot trace it to VAINIO. It is probably merely a lapsus due to confusion with a name<br />

applied to a species of Sphaerophorus, and should be rejected and ignored.<br />

St. par vifolia<br />

A nomen nudum without indication of author, mentioned on pages 313 and 480 of H.<br />

B. DAVIS, "Life and Work of Cyrus Guernsey Pringle" (1936), referring to a specimen numbered<br />

414 collected by PRINGLE in Mexico. Dr. F. SEYMOUR, Assistant Curator of the PRINGLE<br />

Herbarium (VT) informed us in litt. 1967 that no specimen with this name could be found in<br />

their collect ions.<br />

St. paschale ,B. conglomeratum FR.<br />

Schedulae Criticae de Lichenibus Exsiccatis Sueciae, Part 111: 20 (1825).<br />

Typus: Sweden, no exact locality. The isotype material is FRIES, Lich. Suec. Exs. no. 89.<br />

This is not homogeneous; some examples, as in FH, are St. evolutum GRAEWE, others, as in<br />

LD and UPS, a mixture of St. evolutum and St. paschale (L.) H<strong>OF</strong>FM., and yet others, as in<br />

s, entirely St. paschale. The original description does not give much clue as to which of these<br />

species FRIES had in mind, but probably mostly St. evolutum. TH. FRIES (1865, p. 181) also<br />

stated that Lich. Suec. Exs. no. 89 is a mixture, partly consisting of St. evolutum; FREY (1932,<br />

p. 149) states that it contains also St. subcoralloides (NYL.) NYL. In FRIES, Lichenographia<br />

Europaea Reformata: 202 (1831) the same taxon is referred to as St. paschale b. minus FR.;<br />

the word "conglomeratum" forming the description; reference is made to the original Sched.<br />

Critic. publication. TH. FRIES (1857, p. 17) made the combination St. coraZZoides [var.] P.<br />

~onglomeratum (FR.) TH. FR., referring to FR. Lich. Europ. Reform. p. 202, and hence to<br />

St. paschale p. conglomeratum FR. as basionym. In Lichenogr. Scand. (1871) TH. FRIES<br />

refers to the taxon in 2 places: on p. 44 as St. coralloides P. conglomeratum, using it in the sense<br />

of St. subcoralloides (NYL.) NYL., and on p. 47 as St. paschale E. conglomeratum. ZAHLBRUCK-<br />

NER (1926-27, p. 667) lists St. coralloides P. conglomeratum as a synonym of St. subcoralloides.<br />

Finally, VAINIO (1940, p. 10) made the combination Stereocaulon conglomeratum ("TH. FR.")<br />

VAIN., and applied it to St. subcoralloides. We subscribe to the opinion of MAGNUSSON<br />

(1926, p. 51) that the epithet conglorneratum is so thoroughly confused in its application<br />

that it should be dropped entirely. To be rejected (Int. Code Art. 69).<br />

St. paschale ,B. conglomeratum 1. robustum FLOT.<br />

Bot. Zeitung (Berlin), 8: 537 (1850).<br />

A nomen nudum; the only observation given is "Curie et Breutel Herb. No. 141. Gron-<br />

land."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!