26.08.2013 Views

Schola Europaea European School Brussels II

Schola Europaea European School Brussels II

Schola Europaea European School Brussels II

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

an important determinant of whether an<br />

IWB is successfully embedded into a<br />

teacher’s pedagogy, then one might expect<br />

any impact on attainment levels to become<br />

apparent over a longer timeframe. Two<br />

reviews of the Primary <strong>School</strong>s Whiteboard<br />

Expansion Project by researchers from<br />

Manchester Metropolitan University<br />

(Somekh et al, 2007) would suggest that<br />

the introduction of an IWB, for at least<br />

two years, does have a positive and<br />

measurable impact on pupil attainment.<br />

Lewin et al (2008) concluded that their<br />

analysis showed:<br />

“There were measurable gains in<br />

children’s test score results (at age 11)<br />

in Mathematics, English and Science<br />

when they had been taught with an IWB<br />

for more than two years” (p. 296)<br />

Are there any differences in how IWBs are<br />

used in Primary classrooms as opposed to<br />

their use in Secondary school settings ?<br />

There seems to be much more reported<br />

research in the literature on IWBs and<br />

their impact in the primary school<br />

sector than on experiences with IWBs<br />

in the secondary school sector. This<br />

may not be surprising as setting up and<br />

conducting research in primary schools is<br />

generally easier, as they are usually smaller<br />

institutions with whole-class teaching<br />

settings, where the same class would be<br />

taught every day by the same teacher in<br />

a particular classroom. Lewin et al (2008)<br />

recognized this important advantage for<br />

their research context:<br />

“… for the majority of the school day,<br />

primary school teachers are based in the<br />

same classroom and teach most, if not<br />

all, of the curriculum to a single group<br />

of pupils. This meant that teachers, their<br />

teaching assistants and the pupils had<br />

exclusive and sustained access to the<br />

IWB” (p. 292)<br />

Rudd (2007) goes on to say that:<br />

“There is also evidence to suggest<br />

that IWBs may be more ‘accepted’ at<br />

primary level because they are viewed<br />

as a resource more readily identifiable<br />

with primary strategies and whole-class<br />

teaching requirements. The multimodal<br />

aspects allow for concepts to be<br />

explained and expressed in different<br />

formats and styles, and the often ‘tactile’<br />

nature of use has been argued to be<br />

generally beneficial for pupils of this age,<br />

helping to increase the engagement and<br />

attention by engendering ‘theatrical<br />

tension’ in the classroom” (p. 5)<br />

In secondary school classrooms, the IWB<br />

seems to support a more conventional<br />

teacher role, which sees her in front of<br />

PANORAMA<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!