12.10.2013 Views

Gulf and European Energy Supply Security - Feem-project.net

Gulf and European Energy Supply Security - Feem-project.net

Gulf and European Energy Supply Security - Feem-project.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Security</strong>: Potential for EU-GCC Cooperation<br />

Figure 18: International Coal Trade<br />

Source: POLES model, LEPII, SECURE <strong>project</strong><br />

2<br />

The Global Regime scenario clearly allows<br />

the improvement of the situation from these two<br />

perspectives, of reducing both emissions <strong>and</strong> the<br />

level of tension on international hydrocarbon<br />

markets, through lower oil <strong>and</strong> gas production. This<br />

is a potential double dividend situation, probably the<br />

most important one to be derived from ambitious<br />

climate policies. Finally, the Europe Alone scenario<br />

does not meet the climate target as the impacts<br />

of ambitious policies in Europe are not sufficient<br />

to compensate for the massive global emission<br />

increases in the rest of the world. However, in this<br />

scenario setting, there is still an element that is<br />

strongly beneficial for Europe:<br />

• Imposing strong emission reduction domestically<br />

results in a thorough restructuring of the <strong>European</strong><br />

energy system.<br />

• While it is supposed in this scenario that other<br />

countries adopt a free-riding behavior <strong>and</strong> do not<br />

trigger such a restructuring, it is probable that<br />

tensions on the oil <strong>and</strong> gas market would remain<br />

high, with risks of repeated shocks in the near<strong>and</strong><br />

long-term future.<br />

• In that case, Europe would be protected from<br />

these external shocks by lower energy dem<strong>and</strong>,<br />

higher contribution of domestic non-fossil fuels<br />

(renewable <strong>and</strong> nuclear), <strong>and</strong> a much lower level<br />

of fossil fuel imports.<br />

Would this reward of ambitious climate policies<br />

fully compensate for the extra costs of the energy<br />

system restructuring? This question remains open<br />

today, but future developments in the SECURE<br />

<strong>project</strong> may help to better appreciate the magnitude<br />

of the risk avoided through virtuous climate policy<br />

in a non-cooperative international context. Table 4<br />

intends to illustrate the fundamentals of the risks<br />

associated for a country (c) to a negative event<br />

(e) <strong>and</strong> develops the risks in the three archetypal<br />

scenarios examined in this study.<br />

It comes out of this study that an ambitious<br />

policy would bring to Europe a double dividend in its<br />

capacity to develop a new energy model − adjusted<br />

to sound climate policies − <strong>and</strong> in the resulting lower<br />

vulnerability to potential shocks on the international<br />

energy markets. Hence, it appears that it would<br />

probably be in the interest of Europe to implement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!