12.10.2013 Views

Gulf and European Energy Supply Security - Feem-project.net

Gulf and European Energy Supply Security - Feem-project.net

Gulf and European Energy Supply Security - Feem-project.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Security</strong>: Potential for EU-GCC Cooperation<br />

support their decision-making process towards<br />

the definition of energy policies <strong>and</strong> strategies.<br />

In particular, the results of the <strong>project</strong> will<br />

be useful to achieve the appropriate energy<br />

mix regarding energy security of supply <strong>and</strong><br />

sustainability requirements; to improve the<br />

internal energy market regulatory framework; to<br />

develop stable relations with energy exporting<br />

countries <strong>and</strong> external partners; <strong>and</strong> to optimize<br />

the synergies between member states to improve<br />

security of supply.<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Security</strong> – Potential for EU-GCC<br />

Cooperation<br />

The present book has been prepared as an adhoc<br />

background document for the “Conference<br />

on <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Security</strong> – Potential for EU-GCC<br />

Cooperation” organized in cooperation with the<br />

Bahrain Center for Strategic, International <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Energy</strong> Studies. It is a collection <strong>and</strong> summary<br />

of those SECURE <strong>project</strong> results which have a<br />

specific relevance for EU-GCC cooperation.<br />

The first paper contains the highlights of the<br />

energy scenarios developed in the context of<br />

the <strong>project</strong>. Work for this paper was conducted<br />

primarily by LEPII-CNRS. This paper describes<br />

the set of world energy scenarios that have been<br />

developed under the SECURE research <strong>project</strong><br />

in order to study the “Climate Policy <strong>and</strong> <strong>Energy</strong><br />

<strong>Security</strong> Nexus” in a <strong>European</strong> perspective. It<br />

is based on the statement that it is impossible<br />

to examine the energy security issue without<br />

developing a full set of consistent hypotheses on<br />

the intensity of emission reduction policies in the<br />

different world regions. This is underst<strong>and</strong>able as<br />

these policies, if they are sufficiently ambitious<br />

to have an impact on GHG emissions <strong>and</strong> on<br />

the climate, will also have a noticeable impact<br />

on the international energy markets. The paper<br />

examines the impacts of three main scenarios<br />

–- Muddling Through (low intensity climate<br />

policies), Europe Alone, <strong>and</strong> Global Regime -– on<br />

the world <strong>and</strong> <strong>European</strong> energy systems. The<br />

study confirms that the world energy future will<br />

be fully different in the two extreme cases <strong>and</strong><br />

that the Global Regime helps to alleviate both the<br />

climate problem <strong>and</strong> the long-term sustainability<br />

problem of hydrocarbon production. The Europe<br />

Alone case does not solve the latter problem, but it<br />

makes Europe less vulnerable to the risks associated<br />

with future energy shocks.<br />

The second <strong>and</strong> third papers, which are primarily<br />

the responsibility of GRCF, are devoted to the<br />

security of oil supplies – an item of intense common<br />

interest for EU-GCC cooperation. The second paper<br />

focuses in particular on threats to oil supply security.<br />

It follows an analytical approach, distinguishing<br />

different types of threats rather than bundling all<br />

together in an undifferentiated scare scenario. The<br />

primary distinction is between geopolitical <strong>and</strong><br />

military threats: the former are linked to political<br />

developments <strong>and</strong> the adoption or reform of policies<br />

affecting oil production <strong>and</strong> exports (resource<br />

nationalism, political instability). The latter are<br />

linked to the use of military force or violence on<br />

the part of either state or non-state actors. A third<br />

section of the paper deals with potential threats to<br />

oil transportation on the high seas.<br />

The paper argues that there is no easy<br />

<strong>and</strong> immediate connection between resource<br />

nationalism <strong>and</strong>/or political instability, <strong>and</strong> global<br />

supply of oil <strong>and</strong> gas. This is not because political<br />

developments are irrelevant for influencing oil <strong>and</strong><br />

gas supplies, but because this influence is highly<br />

variable <strong>and</strong> unpredictable. Political instability <strong>and</strong><br />

resource nationalism are shown to have rarely been<br />

associated with acute supply crises or shortfalls. Their<br />

effect is rather gradual <strong>and</strong> normally compensated<br />

by action in other parts of the system.<br />

Concerning threats subsequent to the use of<br />

military force, the paper argues that oil <strong>and</strong> gas<br />

installations appear to be much more resilient to<br />

armed conflict than is normally acknowledged.<br />

Interstate wars are a low-probability event; they<br />

are generally confined to two main belligerents <strong>and</strong><br />

contained. In contrast, civil wars or violent action<br />

on the part of non-state actors are phenomena<br />

whose frequency has not diminished at the global<br />

level. Cases in which violent action on the part of<br />

non-state actors has inflicted significant damage to<br />

existing installations include the “insurgency” phase

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!