12.10.2013 Views

Gulf and European Energy Supply Security - Feem-project.net

Gulf and European Energy Supply Security - Feem-project.net

Gulf and European Energy Supply Security - Feem-project.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SESSION IV: LNG <strong>and</strong> Gas Supplies to Europe<br />

Geopolitical Issues of Europe’s Future Gas <strong>Supply</strong><br />

Geopolitical Issues of europe’s Future Gas supply*<br />

Introduction <strong>and</strong> Definition of the Concept<br />

of Geopolitical Risk<br />

The gas industry is gaining an ever-growing<br />

importance in the energy system of the <strong>European</strong><br />

Union (EU) <strong>and</strong> on the global energy scene. As the<br />

2020 target approaches, 1 the need for using less<br />

carbon-producing energy resources becomes more<br />

urgent. The targeted use of renewable resources<br />

might account for 15 percent of the EU’s total energy<br />

mix; it naturally follows that a complete halt to fossil<br />

fuel usage is not possible in the short or medium<br />

term. However, the process of switching to non-fossil<br />

energy sources can be accompanied by increased use<br />

of more environment-friendly fossil fuels. Natural<br />

gas is indeed a particularly adequate alternative to<br />

oil <strong>and</strong> coal, especially for power-producing plants.<br />

Gas can be considered to emit half the amount of CO₂<br />

compared to oil <strong>and</strong> one fourth compared to coal.<br />

The strategic importance of natural gas for the<br />

EU is very clear. Until recently, an important share<br />

of gas consumed in the EU was produced internally,<br />

thanks mainly to the Dutch <strong>and</strong> British resources.<br />

Today, however, imports represent the major supply<br />

source. This situation is expected to worsen as fields<br />

in the Dutch <strong>and</strong> British part of the North Sea are<br />

rapidly depleting. At this moment, the EU will face<br />

the potentially dangerous situation of being forced<br />

to import the vast majority of an energy source vital<br />

for its functioning.<br />

The major element causing unease among<br />

experts <strong>and</strong> governments is that certain sources of<br />

gas supplies to the EU are believed to be vulnerable<br />

in the sense that they face the threat of being<br />

disrupted or even completely stopped. The reasons<br />

for this may lie in a technical issue, a physical<br />

impossibility to supply the required volumes of gas,<br />

or the inappropriate behavior of one actor in the<br />

supply process. This last category, which falls under<br />

‘geopolitical risks,’ is dealt with in this paper.<br />

For the purpose of this paper, risk could be<br />

described as the set of threats imposed on the<br />

security of natural gas supply to <strong>European</strong> Union<br />

members <strong>and</strong> caused by the specific behavior of one<br />

or more countries (producing or transit) or non-state<br />

actors <strong>and</strong> by the evolution of global institutions <strong>and</strong><br />

markets.<br />

1.theoretical Geopolitical Risks<br />

It seems appropriate, as a theoretical<br />

recapitulation, to provide a list of events or situations<br />

that could be considered as threats for the supply<br />

of natural gas to the EU. At the outset, it must<br />

also be stressed that the gas business functions<br />

very differently from the oil one, the first reason<br />

being the physical characteristics of each energy<br />

source. While oil can be put in vessels <strong>and</strong> shipped<br />

all over the world, gas is primarily transported by<br />

pipeline. Consequently, the gas market is less prone<br />

to experiencing high <strong>and</strong> unexpected volatility,<br />

although gas prices are tied to oil prices.<br />

Until now, the political economy of gas has<br />

been much more regional <strong>and</strong> bilateral as the main<br />

instrument used by the market is the take-or-pay<br />

long-term contract. There are advantages <strong>and</strong><br />

disadvantages to this situation. First of all, gas prices<br />

are less likely to experience dramatic increases, as a<br />

shock in one part of this fragmented market does not<br />

necessarily impact another part. Pipeline flows can<br />

hardly be reversed unless the pipe is designed to do<br />

so, <strong>and</strong> the customer at the end of the pipe cannot<br />

* This paper was written by François-Loïc Henry (GRCF) also based on work by Stefan Schaar Kruse (Ramboll) <strong>and</strong> Sohbet Karbuz (OME)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!