Hayek's The Constitution of Liberty - Institute of Economic Affairs
Hayek's The Constitution of Liberty - Institute of Economic Affairs
Hayek's The Constitution of Liberty - Institute of Economic Affairs
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1 HAYEK’S INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Constitution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Liberty</strong> begins with a ‘Preface’ and ‘Introduction,’<br />
but the first thing to strike one’s eye is the title itself.<br />
One might infer from it that Hayek intends to depict an institutional<br />
arrangement or framework <strong>of</strong> government that promotes<br />
liberty; but in fact the book says little about government’s internal<br />
structure and operations. Later Hayek would clarify the meaning<br />
<strong>of</strong> his title: ‘I then used the term “constitution” in the wide sense<br />
in which we use it also to describe the state <strong>of</strong> fitness <strong>of</strong> a person’<br />
(1973: 3). Hayek is concerned with liberty’s present shape or condition<br />
– whether it is fit or unhealthy. Believing that liberty is in<br />
dire straits, he will diagnose the causes <strong>of</strong> its ill constitution and<br />
prescribe a remedy that might restore its fitness.<br />
Hayek identifies liberty closely with Western civilisation. <strong>The</strong><br />
principles <strong>of</strong> liberty or freedom – he uses these terms interchangeably<br />
(see 421) – grew out <strong>of</strong> the Western experience, and the West<br />
flourished by adhering to them. By the mid-nineteenth century,<br />
however, the West began to lose faith in the principles <strong>of</strong> liberty;<br />
and now it lacks firm beliefs on which to oppose threatening<br />
ideologies. In various writings Hayek emphasises one or another<br />
proximate danger to Western liberty – central planning, demands<br />
for social justice, excesses <strong>of</strong> majority rule – but the ultimate<br />
danger is this loss <strong>of</strong> faith and self-confidence. Hayek is especially<br />
harsh in his indictment <strong>of</strong> Western intellectuals, who have long<br />
29