25.12.2013 Views

Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinary Values - eTheses Repository ...

Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinary Values - eTheses Repository ...

Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinary Values - eTheses Repository ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 9. The second theme: Relation<br />

The taxonomy of attitude meanings provided by Appraisal theory proved to be an elegant <strong>and</strong><br />

powerful way of classifying most of the meanings expressed by the A DJ PR EP N patterns<br />

occurring in the data extracted from my two corpora. However, my qualitative analysis also<br />

identified phraseologies which could not easily be classified within this framework, <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

to an analysis of these additional data that we now turn in this chapter.<br />

Specifically, my qualitative concordance analysis found that, as well as evaluating<br />

phenomena, A DJ PR EP N patterns in ALC <strong>and</strong> BC are also used to describe various kinds of<br />

relationship between phenomena. This chapter presents how these relations between things<br />

are construed through the pattern A DJ PR EP N, <strong>and</strong> how these patterns (<strong>and</strong> the meanings<br />

that they make) differ across the two corpora. The following analysis will divide relations into<br />

two main kinds identified in the data, namely connection <strong>and</strong> attribute (Figure 9.1).<br />

Figure 9.1. Two relations expressed by the pattern A DJ PR EP N<br />

A taxonomic hierarchy of any group of entities is structured by comparing whether one entity<br />

is superordinate, subordinate or coordinate to another. In other words, a relation between<br />

entities is basically horizontal or vertical or linear or top-down/bottom-up. In the following<br />

analysis, I will describe the horizontal relation between entities as connection, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

vertical relation as attribute. These labels are essentially empirical <strong>and</strong> corpus-driven, in that<br />

they largely conform to (<strong>and</strong> are thus suggested by) the meanings of relations expressed by<br />

the patterns A DJ PR EP N as they occur in my data.<br />

The procedure upon which the following analysis is based is essentially the same as<br />

that followed for the attitude analysis conducted in the previous chapter. Specifically, I began<br />

by identifying which adjectives occurred in each prepositional type of the pattern A DJ PR EP<br />

N expressing a relation meaning. Then, the most frequent adjectives in each pattern were<br />

selected <strong>and</strong> categorized into several semantic groups based on my concordance-informed<br />

154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!