Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinary Values - eTheses Repository ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The above context expresses a warning and negative feelings about the dependent relation between the automatic systems: the performance of ERP systems has the possibility to affect the SCM system negatively. Thus, the dependent relation is negatively evaluated in business studies, but the independent relation is seen as rather more welcome. We will return to this argument in the next section (9.1.4), where we consider the DISTANCE group. In contrast to BC, most examples of this phraseology in ALC seem to make observations of a more neutral kind. Although 10 examples of the collocation with not and less are found in the total 82 examples (12%), they simply express research observations with no positive/negative evaluation. While the collocates not and less obviously express negative polarity, most of the examples above are not evaluatively negative because they simply describe what a writer observes in the study. 9.1.4. Distance The fourth form of connection in the present data is distance. Adjectives in this group express the ways in which people, things, or groups are (not) separated or different from one another in some respects, and in particular indicates whether or not there is a certain disparity/similarity between two things. Some adjectives in this group also indicate that something is no longer affected by another thing (e.g. free from N), because one is in the location far from the place under influence of another. Thus, this group is especially expressed by adjectives in the pattern A DJ from N. (N.B. the preposition from particularly expresses either the distance between things or the source of something; this semantic group prioritizes the former meaning). Table 9.11 below summarizes adjectives in this group. 172
order ALC freq. BC freq. 1 different 242 different 266 2 far 43 distinct 33 3 distinct 30 far 28 4 absent 19 separate 15 5 separate 18 independent 13 6 separated 14 indistinguishable 13 7 distant 9 free 13 8 missing 6 absent 9 9 indistinguishable 6 exempt 9 10 free 6 separated 8 11 independent 5 missing 6 12 divorced 5 distant 4 13 inseparable 4 divorced 3 14 separable 4 unchanged 3 15 further 3 distinguishable 3 16 distinguishable 3 further 2 17 alienated 2 consistent 2 18 distanced 1 disengaged 1 19 equidistant 1 remote 1 20 unchanged 1 detached 1 21 detachable 1 inseparable 1 22 exempt 1 secure 1 23 immune 1 Total 424 436 Prop. 49% 51% Table 9.11. The DISTANCE group in A DJ from N As can be seen, the adjective different is by far the most frequent in this group in both corpora. While different obviously indicates the characteristic distance between two things, independent rather expresses the locational distance, especially whether or not one is influenced by another (i.e. they are not relevant to each other). Due to the limit of the size in this study, this section treats only some distance connections that most clearly present the disciplinary differences observed in this group. One of the most interesting distance connections in this regard is the concept of independence. Applied linguistics is likely to regard the independent relation as the existence of irrelevance (or non-relevance) between things. Business studies, however, interprets independence as freedom, that is, as a favourable situation in which to conduct business activity without any restrictions. To illustrate this, let us consider the examples of the LSP independent from N from both corpora. 173
Page 1 and 2:
Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinar
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTS C H APT E R 1. Introductio
Page 7 and 8:
C H APT E R 9. The second theme: Re
Page 9 and 10:
Figure A-1 Histogram for tokens of
Page 11 and 12:
Table 8.15 The SKILFULNESS group in
Page 13 and 14:
CHAPTER 1. Introduction 1.1. Genera
Page 15 and 16:
study are still not large enough fo
Page 17 and 18:
RQ1) Is it valuable to apply a new
Page 19 and 20:
in the way each of these evaluative
Page 21 and 22:
disciplines feature different bodie
Page 23 and 24:
White and Liccardi (2006) have show
Page 25 and 26:
However, it was not possible to cla
Page 27 and 28:
typically presented as impersonal a
Page 29 and 30:
2.5. Applied linguistics and busine
Page 31 and 32:
2.6.2. Business studies Business co
Page 33 and 34:
Swales (2004) thus offers a rather
Page 35 and 36:
genre has come increasingly under t
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 3. Pattern, meaning and eva
Page 39 and 40:
170). 7 On the basis of the vast am
Page 41 and 42:
3.3. Lexico-grammatical patterns 3.
Page 43 and 44:
syntactic patterns encodes differen
Page 45 and 46:
RESULT/DATA based on DATA/THEORY In
Page 47 and 48:
(Biber, 1988, p. 237). Indeed, Chaf
Page 49 and 50:
aspect of language use. For these r
Page 51 and 52:
1986), hedging (Holmes, 1988; Hylan
Page 53 and 54:
adverbs but rather in certain patte
Page 55 and 56:
average work is described as sound
Page 57 and 58:
are also interrelated. In an attemp
Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 4. Correspondence analysis
Page 61 and 62:
- end. Although there is no doubt t
Page 63 and 64:
appeal of multivariate analysis is
Page 65 and 66:
While such observations might be in
Page 67 and 68:
The contingency table has the follo
Page 69 and 70:
CHAPTER 5. Corpus creation and meth
Page 71 and 72:
of sub-disciplines contained within
Page 73 and 74:
As Figure 5.1 illustrates, regardle
Page 75 and 76:
corpus-based discourse analysis. Th
Page 77 and 78:
analysis was conducted with the mat
Page 79 and 80:
5.3.4. Discourse analysis procedure
Page 81 and 82:
CHAPTER 6. A case study In this cha
Page 83 and 84:
express human feelings: specificall
Page 85 and 86:
contingency table consists of 66 ro
Page 87 and 88:
of this case study is limited. Howe
Page 89 and 90:
likely to express what they feel ab
Page 91 and 92:
6.2.2. The NERVOUSNESS group While
Page 93 and 94:
adjectives in this group in the pat
Page 95 and 96:
While the LSP enthusiastic about N
Page 97 and 98:
AWARE and IGNORANT group in Francis
Page 99 and 100:
CHAPTER 7. Data analyses 7.1. Intro
Page 101 and 102:
The table is divided into high-freq
Page 103 and 104:
about of Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. B
Page 105 and 106:
Tables 7.2 and 7.3 above indicate t
Page 107 and 108:
same for a corpus of a more special
Page 109 and 110:
Table 7.5 above indicates that simi
Page 111 and 112:
about for from in of on to with 8 l
Page 113 and 114:
In the plot shown in Figure 7.1, it
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 7.4. Adjective plot in the s
Page 117 and 118:
Figure 7.7. Adjective plot for A DJ
Page 119 and 120:
Figure 7.9. Adjective plot for the
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
same time. This being the case, I h
Page 127 and 128:
Other adjectives in this quadrant a
Page 129 and 130:
This concludes my analysis of the e
Page 131 and 132:
Figure 7.21 also indicates that adj
Page 133 and 134: With the sole exception of the patt
Page 135 and 136: evaluation (Martin & Rose, 2007, p.
Page 137 and 138: judgments tend to draw on both emot
Page 139 and 140: [Business studies: neutral about/on
Page 141 and 142: modals in BC, on the other hand, mo
Page 143 and 144: Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 more 14
Page 145 and 146: itself. 8.1.3. Importance The third
Page 147 and 148: Fewer of the control variables are
Page 149 and 150: someone/something is certain or unc
Page 151 and 152: current/past oriented. While the nu
Page 153 and 154: monogloss heterogloss ALC 35%(7) 65
Page 155 and 156: that the default assumption among a
Page 157 and 158: monogloss heterogloss ALC 29%(4) 71
Page 159 and 160: general category of appreciation as
Page 161 and 162: while the BC examples evaluate the
Page 163 and 164: it seems that researchers in busine
Page 165 and 166: Overall, my findings suggest that a
Page 167 and 168: interpretation. Finally, these sema
Page 169 and 170: entities. This group is especially
Page 171 and 172: [Applied Linguistics] [
Page 173 and 174: The proportions for this group are
Page 175 and 176: In addition, this LSP strongly occu
Page 177 and 178: or evidence in the writers (ongoing
Page 179 and 180: Francis et al. (1998, p. 479) indic
Page 181 and 182: In summary, the intensity of severa
Page 183: The depended- entities in ALC are p
Page 187 and 188: [Business Studies] Thi
Page 189 and 190: [Applied Linguistics] Scores (but
Page 191 and 192: In general, business studies discou
Page 193 and 194: Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 involved
Page 195 and 196: [Applied Linguistics]
Page 197 and 198: [Business Studies] Language is
Page 199 and 200: something (e.g. ability, knowledge,
Page 201 and 202: [Business Studies] Only companies
Page 203 and 204: adverbs. Table 9.18 below summarize
Page 205 and 206: Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 responsi
Page 207 and 208: Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 present
Page 209 and 210: ALC BC Negative Noun inherent other
Page 211 and 212: In each of the above concordances t
Page 213 and 214: Several adjectives in this group in
Page 215 and 216: [Business Studies] Our sample is r
Page 217 and 218: Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 study 27
Page 219 and 220: [Business studies: model + based on
Page 221 and 222: particular thing in order to deepen
Page 223 and 224: across the two disciplines. However
Page 225 and 226: A DJ PR EP N. Figure 10.1. Discipli
Page 227 and 228: likely to occur in applied linguist
Page 229 and 230: 10.3.2. Cause vs. Effect As argued
Page 231 and 232: and unostentatious fashion. This fi
Page 233 and 234: 10.4. Conclusion The fundamental as
Page 235 and 236:
as follows: [A new methodology] RQ1
Page 237 and 238:
linguistics and business studies on
Page 239 and 240:
disciplinary culture of the two dis
Page 241 and 242:
p. 156). By investigating a corpus,
Page 243 and 244:
Figure A-3: Histogram for types of
Page 245 and 246:
Appendix B: Tables for adjectives i
Page 247 and 248:
vague 1 worried 1 1 2 1 2 1 wrong 1
Page 249 and 250:
indispensable 1 1 ineligible 2 1 in
Page 251 and 252:
indistinguishable 8 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 i
Page 253 and 254:
immersed 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 implicated 4
Page 255 and 256:
Table B-10. Contingency table for t
Page 257 and 258:
12 conditional 3 clear 5 26 good 1
Page 259 and 260:
51 free 17 unique 18 141 antagonist
Page 261 and 262:
comparable 21 2 8 3 1 2 3 11 3 4 7
Page 263 and 264:
new 2 12 1 11 2 5 4 8 3 2 9 3 45 ne
Page 265 and 266:
27 comparable 4 competitive 3 68 si
Page 267 and 268:
pregnant 1 preoccupied 2 1 1 replet
Page 269 and 270:
crucial-as 1 effecti
Page 271 and 272:
puzzled-by 1 recogni
Page 273 and 274:
SRHE/Open University Press Bell, R.
Page 275 and 276:
articles in biology and history. In
Page 277 and 278:
Herbert, A. (1965). The structure o
Page 279 and 280:
Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the
Page 281 and 282:
Rundell, M. (Ed.). (2007). Macmilla
Page 283:
functional perspective. English for
show all

Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinary Values - eTheses Repository ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?