Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinary Values - eTheses Repository ...

Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks
and skills (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Tabata, T. (2002). Corpus and text: The present and future of English corpus linguisti
cs in Japan [PowerPoint slides]. Paper presented at the Symposium of Japan Ass
ociation for English Corpus Studies 2002. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from htt
p://www.lang.osaka-u.ac.jp/~tabata/corpora&texts.pdf
Tabata, T. (2006). A statistical approach to style and discourse in inaugural addresses of U.S.
presidents: Correspondence analysis of high frequency words. The Institute of Statistical
Mathematics Cooperative Research Report, 190, 47-58.
Tench, P. (1996). The intonation systems of English. London: Cassell.
Thetela, P. (1997). Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles.
English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 101-118.
Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. P. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for
Specific Purposes, 13(2), 129-148.
Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G.
Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse
(pp. 1-27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation of the reporting verbs used in academic papers.
Applied Linguistics, 12, 365-82.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ure, J. (1971). Lexical density and register differentiation. In G. Perren & J. Trim (Eds.),
Applications of linguistics (pp. 443-452). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific
and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2),
177-200.
Vázquez, I., Lafuente, E., Lorés, R., & Mur, M. P. (2006). How to explore academic
writing from metadiscourse as an integrated framework of interpersonal meaning:
Three perspectives of analysis. In C. Pérez-Llantada, R. Pló & P. Neuman (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 5 th International AELF E Conference (pp. 197-208). Zaragoza:Pr
ensas Universitarias. Retrieved April 20, 2008, from http://www.unizar.es/aelfe2006/
ALEFE06/1.discourse/29..pdf
White, P. (2004). The appraisal website: Homepage. Retrieved September 5, 2008,
from http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal
White, S., & Liccardi, I. (2006). Harnessing insight into disciplinary differences to refine
e-learning design. Proceedings of 36 th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education
Conference (pp. 5-10). San Diego, CA: IEEE.
Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Communication and community: The pragmatics of ESP. English
for Specific Purposes, 17(1), 3-14.
Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21(1),
3-25.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Yang, R., & D. Allison. (2004). Research articles in applied linguistics: Structures from a
270