Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinary Values - eTheses Repository ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Forsyth, R. S., & Holmes, D. I. (1996). Feature-finding for text classification. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 11(4), 163-174. Fowler, R. G. (1990). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge. Francis, G. (1993). A corpus-driven approach to grammar: Principles, methods and examples. In N. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology (pp. 137-156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Francis, G. (1995). Corpus-driven grammar and its relevance to the learning of English in a cross-cultural situation. In A. Pakir (Ed.), English in education: Multicultural perspectives. Singapore: Unipress. Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E. (1996). Collins COBUILD grammar patterns 1: Verbs. London: Harper Collins. Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E. (1998). Collins COBUILD grammar patterns 2: Nouns and adjectives. London: Harper Collins. Gavioli, L. (2002). Some thoughts on the problem of representing ESP through small corpora. In B. Kettemann & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis (pp. 293-303). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Gavioli, L. & Aston, G. (2001). Enriching reality: Language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal, 55(3), 238-246. Ghadessy, M., Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. (2001). Small corpus studies and ELT: Theory and practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Gledhill, C. (2000). Collocations in science writing. Tubingen: Gunter Narr. Goto, K. (2005). Go tagger. [Computer software]. Osaka: Osaka University. Graham, M. B. (1998). Connections and fissures: Discipline formation in business communication. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(1), 7-13. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press. Gries, S. T. (2008). Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 3-25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Groom, N. (2005). Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 257-277. Groom, N. (2007). Phraseology and epistemology in humanities writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Groom, N., & Littlemore, J. (2011). Doing applied linguistics: A guide for students. London: Routledge. Hagge, J. (1987). The process religion and business communication. The Journal of Business Communication, 24(1), 89-120. Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. New York, NY: Doubleday. Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). On language and linguistics. London: Continuum. Halliday, M. A. K. (2005). On grammar. London: Continuum. Hemais, B. (2001). The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 39-59. 264
Herbert, A. (1965). The structure of technical English. London: Longman. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1993). Language as ideology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Hoey, M. (1997). From concordance to text structure: New uses for computer corpora. In J. Melia & B. Lawandoska (Eds.), Proceedings of PALC 97: The 1997 practical applications of language corpora (PALC) conference (pp. 2-23). Lodz: Lodz University Press. Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 20-44. Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-337. Hornby, A. S. (1954). Guide to patterns and usage in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Huebner, T. (1983a). Linguistic systems and linguistic change in an interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(1), 33-53. Huebner, T. (1983b). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers. Hunston, S. (1993). Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 57-73). London: Pinter. Hunston, S. (1995). A corpus study of some English verbs of attribution. Functions of Language, 2(2), 133-158. Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 176-207). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hunston, S. (2002a). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hunston, S. (2002b). Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation: Applications of a corpus-driven grammar. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp.167-183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Hunston, S. (2007a). MPhil(B) in corpus linguistics: Local grammar, construction grammar and frame semantics, 13th March notes. [Class handout]. Department of English, University of Birmingham. Birmingham, UK. Hunston, S. (2007b). Birmingham university postgraduate seminar: Semantic prosody revisited. [Seminar handout]. Department of English, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Hunston, S. (2007c). Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(2), 249-268. Hunston, S. (2008). Starting with the small words: Patterns, lexis and semantic sequences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(3), 271-295. Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (1999). Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Hunston, S., & Sinclair, J. (2000). A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 74-101). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239-256. Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied 265
Page 1 and 2:
Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinar
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTS C H APT E R 1. Introductio
Page 7 and 8:
C H APT E R 9. The second theme: Re
Page 9 and 10:
Figure A-1 Histogram for tokens of
Page 11 and 12:
Table 8.15 The SKILFULNESS group in
Page 13 and 14:
CHAPTER 1. Introduction 1.1. Genera
Page 15 and 16:
study are still not large enough fo
Page 17 and 18:
RQ1) Is it valuable to apply a new
Page 19 and 20:
in the way each of these evaluative
Page 21 and 22:
disciplines feature different bodie
Page 23 and 24:
White and Liccardi (2006) have show
Page 25 and 26:
However, it was not possible to cla
Page 27 and 28:
typically presented as impersonal a
Page 29 and 30:
2.5. Applied linguistics and busine
Page 31 and 32:
2.6.2. Business studies Business co
Page 33 and 34:
Swales (2004) thus offers a rather
Page 35 and 36:
genre has come increasingly under t
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 3. Pattern, meaning and eva
Page 39 and 40:
170). 7 On the basis of the vast am
Page 41 and 42:
3.3. Lexico-grammatical patterns 3.
Page 43 and 44:
syntactic patterns encodes differen
Page 45 and 46:
RESULT/DATA based on DATA/THEORY In
Page 47 and 48:
(Biber, 1988, p. 237). Indeed, Chaf
Page 49 and 50:
aspect of language use. For these r
Page 51 and 52:
1986), hedging (Holmes, 1988; Hylan
Page 53 and 54:
adverbs but rather in certain patte
Page 55 and 56:
average work is described as sound
Page 57 and 58:
are also interrelated. In an attemp
Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 4. Correspondence analysis
Page 61 and 62:
- end. Although there is no doubt t
Page 63 and 64:
appeal of multivariate analysis is
Page 65 and 66:
While such observations might be in
Page 67 and 68:
The contingency table has the follo
Page 69 and 70:
CHAPTER 5. Corpus creation and meth
Page 71 and 72:
of sub-disciplines contained within
Page 73 and 74:
As Figure 5.1 illustrates, regardle
Page 75 and 76:
corpus-based discourse analysis. Th
Page 77 and 78:
analysis was conducted with the mat
Page 79 and 80:
5.3.4. Discourse analysis procedure
Page 81 and 82:
CHAPTER 6. A case study In this cha
Page 83 and 84:
express human feelings: specificall
Page 85 and 86:
contingency table consists of 66 ro
Page 87 and 88:
of this case study is limited. Howe
Page 89 and 90:
likely to express what they feel ab
Page 91 and 92:
6.2.2. The NERVOUSNESS group While
Page 93 and 94:
adjectives in this group in the pat
Page 95 and 96:
While the LSP enthusiastic about N
Page 97 and 98:
AWARE and IGNORANT group in Francis
Page 99 and 100:
CHAPTER 7. Data analyses 7.1. Intro
Page 101 and 102:
The table is divided into high-freq
Page 103 and 104:
about of Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. B
Page 105 and 106:
Tables 7.2 and 7.3 above indicate t
Page 107 and 108:
same for a corpus of a more special
Page 109 and 110:
Table 7.5 above indicates that simi
Page 111 and 112:
about for from in of on to with 8 l
Page 113 and 114:
In the plot shown in Figure 7.1, it
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 7.4. Adjective plot in the s
Page 117 and 118:
Figure 7.7. Adjective plot for A DJ
Page 119 and 120:
Figure 7.9. Adjective plot for the
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
same time. This being the case, I h
Page 127 and 128:
Other adjectives in this quadrant a
Page 129 and 130:
This concludes my analysis of the e
Page 131 and 132:
Figure 7.21 also indicates that adj
Page 133 and 134:
With the sole exception of the patt
Page 135 and 136:
evaluation (Martin & Rose, 2007, p.
Page 137 and 138:
judgments tend to draw on both emot
Page 139 and 140:
[Business studies: neutral about/on
Page 141 and 142:
modals in BC, on the other hand, mo
Page 143 and 144:
Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 more 14
Page 145 and 146:
itself. 8.1.3. Importance The third
Page 147 and 148:
Fewer of the control variables are
Page 149 and 150:
someone/something is certain or unc
Page 151 and 152:
current/past oriented. While the nu
Page 153 and 154:
monogloss heterogloss ALC 35%(7) 65
Page 155 and 156:
that the default assumption among a
Page 157 and 158:
monogloss heterogloss ALC 29%(4) 71
Page 159 and 160:
general category of appreciation as
Page 161 and 162:
while the BC examples evaluate the
Page 163 and 164:
it seems that researchers in busine
Page 165 and 166:
Overall, my findings suggest that a
Page 167 and 168:
interpretation. Finally, these sema
Page 169 and 170:
entities. This group is especially
Page 171 and 172:
[Applied Linguistics] [
Page 173 and 174:
The proportions for this group are
Page 175 and 176:
In addition, this LSP strongly occu
Page 177 and 178:
or evidence in the writers (ongoing
Page 179 and 180:
Francis et al. (1998, p. 479) indic
Page 181 and 182:
In summary, the intensity of severa
Page 183 and 184:
The depended- entities in ALC are p
Page 185 and 186:
order ALC freq. BC freq. 1 differen
Page 187 and 188:
[Business Studies] Thi
Page 189 and 190:
[Applied Linguistics] Scores (but
Page 191 and 192:
In general, business studies discou
Page 193 and 194:
Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 involved
Page 195 and 196:
[Applied Linguistics]
Page 197 and 198:
[Business Studies] Language is
Page 199 and 200:
something (e.g. ability, knowledge,
Page 201 and 202:
[Business Studies] Only companies
Page 203 and 204:
adverbs. Table 9.18 below summarize
Page 205 and 206:
Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 responsi
Page 207 and 208:
Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 present
Page 209 and 210:
ALC BC Negative Noun inherent other
Page 211 and 212:
In each of the above concordances t
Page 213 and 214:
Several adjectives in this group in
Page 215 and 216:
[Business Studies] Our sample is r
Page 217 and 218:
Order ALC Freq. BC Freq. 1 study 27
Page 219 and 220:
[Business studies: model + based on
Page 221 and 222:
particular thing in order to deepen
Page 223 and 224:
across the two disciplines. However
Page 225 and 226: A DJ PR EP N. Figure 10.1. Discipli
Page 227 and 228: likely to occur in applied linguist
Page 229 and 230: 10.3.2. Cause vs. Effect As argued
Page 231 and 232: and unostentatious fashion. This fi
Page 233 and 234: 10.4. Conclusion The fundamental as
Page 235 and 236: as follows: [A new methodology] RQ1
Page 237 and 238: linguistics and business studies on
Page 239 and 240: disciplinary culture of the two dis
Page 241 and 242: p. 156). By investigating a corpus,
Page 243 and 244: Figure A-3: Histogram for types of
Page 245 and 246: Appendix B: Tables for adjectives i
Page 247 and 248: vague 1 worried 1 1 2 1 2 1 wrong 1
Page 249 and 250: indispensable 1 1 ineligible 2 1 in
Page 251 and 252: indistinguishable 8 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 i
Page 253 and 254: immersed 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 implicated 4
Page 255 and 256: Table B-10. Contingency table for t
Page 257 and 258: 12 conditional 3 clear 5 26 good 1
Page 259 and 260: 51 free 17 unique 18 141 antagonist
Page 261 and 262: comparable 21 2 8 3 1 2 3 11 3 4 7
Page 263 and 264: new 2 12 1 11 2 5 4 8 3 2 9 3 45 ne
Page 265 and 266: 27 comparable 4 competitive 3 68 si
Page 267 and 268: pregnant 1 preoccupied 2 1 1 replet
Page 269 and 270: crucial-as 1 effecti
Page 271 and 272: puzzled-by 1 recogni
Page 273 and 274: SRHE/Open University Press Bell, R.
Page 275: articles in biology and history. In
Page 279 and 280: Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the
Page 281 and 282: Rundell, M. (Ed.). (2007). Macmilla
Page 283: functional perspective. English for
show all

Evaluative Meanings and Disciplinary Values - eTheses Repository ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?