27.12.2013 Views

Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Herbert Discussing the Word 131<br />

this to be the case as well. While The Temple could point to the various incarnations of the<br />

historical temple in Jerusalem (and possibly even the Tabernacle), this is too limited of a<br />

reading to incorporate all of the meanings that Herbert presents his readers with in his<br />

book of poems. Likewise, The Church could be based on seventeenth-century British<br />

churches, but once again, this is too narrow of a reading to incorporate all that the reader is<br />

presented with in The Church. A better way to view the architecture of the book is to view<br />

the terms in their various, mutable forms. The Temple then is not a literal building, but a<br />

place of worship, and because of the immense human and incarnational/Christological<br />

themes of the book, it is also the Temple that is the body, the ‘Temple of the holy Ghost’. 13<br />

Likewise, The Church is a physical church, and the bride of Christ, and the body of the<br />

believer. The book operates as a movement in (‘Church Porch’ to Church) and out<br />

(Church to ‘Church Militant’), just as the title allows for the physically external location of<br />

communion with the divine in an actual Temple, and as an internal location of communion<br />

with the body acting as the place of communion. This view of the architecture allows for a<br />

fluidity that incorporates the various functions that Herbert places on the Temple and<br />

Church without losing the significance that the words ‘temple’ and ‘church’ add to our<br />

understanding of the work. In light of this view of Herbert’s work as architect of his<br />

poetry, without denying assertions such as Stanley Fish’s that The Temple functions as a<br />

catechism 14 or relating the work to the Old Testament Temple or seventeenth-century<br />

English churches, I will be discussing the architecture of the book in relation to the<br />

dichotomy of Law and Gospel of the Old and New Testaments as well as the dichotomy<br />

contained in the human/divine conversation that Herbert carries out in much of The<br />

Church.<br />

13 1 Corinthians 6.19, William Aldis Wright (ed,), The Authorized Version of the English Bible, 1611, 5 vols.,<br />

(Cambridge, 1909), all quotations from the Bible are from this edition.<br />

14 Stanley Fish, The Living Temple (London, 1978).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!