27.12.2013 Views

Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Herbert Discussing the Word 156<br />

described as ‘Gods breath in man returning to his birth’. The God-breathed creation of<br />

Adam is now returning that breath to God when the Church talks to him, and while prayer<br />

as a force of creation, makes perfect sense in a religion whose creation myth and<br />

knowledge of God comes solely through words, it is the third stanza that shows prayer as a<br />

part of the Incarnation. Although there are other images of God as life-giver and redeemer<br />

with prayer variously being described as ‘Christ-side-piercing spear’, ‘The six-daies world<br />

transposing in an houre’, and ‘Exalted Manna’, it is line eleven that is particularly<br />

noteworthy. Line eleven contains only six words, but those six words completely sum up<br />

who Jesus is in the Incarnation and what believers become when they commune with God<br />

by way of the work of the Incarnation, ‘Heaven in ordinarie, man well drest’. Prayer then<br />

is not just words, it not just an action, but it is a being. Prayer is the ‘Word . . . made<br />

flesh’. 50<br />

And here prayer, relationship with God, all interactions between creator and<br />

created, move by way of the Incarnation. Herbert is Christological in his poetic emphasis;<br />

he only presents his readers with Christ as a way to know God. If God the father is beyond<br />

all comprehension, then God as a carpenter is very easily considered. If God is King of<br />

Kings and Lord of Lords, above all approach and reproach, then a working-class God is<br />

approachable by anyone regardless of social standing. This too allows Herbert to approach<br />

God with his voice and to hear God speak to him in a language that he can understand.<br />

Just as the Bible was the Word of God written in the language of God’s people, so too was<br />

the Word incarnate as one of God’s people, and so when Elizabeth Clarke states that<br />

‘Herbert is all too aware that no external voice actually intrudes into his poetry: at least, if<br />

it does, it speaks in his own familiar accents’, 51 she is both correct and incorrect, because<br />

there is an external voice, but because of the Incarnation and the indwelling of the Holy<br />

Spirit in this Temple, God’s voice will speak in Herbert’s ‘familiar accents’, and this<br />

50 John 1.14.<br />

51 Elizabeth Clarke, Theory and Theology in George Herbert’s Poetry (Oxford, 1997), p. 268.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!