Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...
Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...
Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
‘Looke Downe to Heaven’ 232<br />
that she cannot truly comprehend what would be happening. Her ‘hunger feeles not what<br />
he eates’, and yet, when Jesus feeds, he will feed all. The final couplet in this poem<br />
inverts what motherly sacrifice and feeding is about. The male Jesus will have a ‘Teat’ for<br />
suckling, and at it his mother will find nourishment. This ‘bloody one’ that will arrive<br />
‘e’re long’ for the woman, and all of Christ’s followers, is a ghastly, yet theologically<br />
sound and profound, reminder of just what comes with the belief in a religion that requires<br />
God to become incarnate in the flesh, and then to die for them. Further, he dies for<br />
humanity, and from him, humanity must find their life. Crashaw is playing with an<br />
amazing amount of concepts in these two lines of verse. First, he graphically portrays<br />
Christ providing sustenance for his followers. He then shows Mother Mary as indebted to,<br />
and inferior to, her son, because she must ultimately be ‘Tabled at [his] Teates’. He is<br />
even using the concept of the Galenic view of the body in which mother’s milk was<br />
believed to be a form of blood. 50<br />
Mary may have provided the infant Jesus with life<br />
through her transformed blood as he sucked at her breasts, but Jesus provides her with a<br />
transformed life through having her suck undiluted blood from his body. He offers life<br />
eternal through an unmediated access to his life blood as it flows from teats that have been<br />
violently created on his body. And finally, the baseness of the language, the ‘paps’ and<br />
‘Teates’ and ‘suck’, force the reader to confront the reality of the beliefs underpinning both<br />
salvation and a transubstantiated communion meal with Jesus. While it is very tempting to<br />
read a criticism of both Mary and transubstantiation in these verses due to the poems direct<br />
and harsh language, I do not believe that this is what Crashaw intends us to do. I believe<br />
that these unsettling lines are also calls to celebration. Only one woman could be so<br />
blessed as to nurse the Incarnation, but all can, and must, suck the bloody body of the<br />
crucified and risen Lord. Mary was truly blessed to have Jesus at her breast, as we see<br />
50 Michael C. Schoenfeldt, Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England (Cambridge, 1999), p. 26.