27.12.2013 Views

Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

Jesse Sharpe PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘Looke Downe to Heaven’ 232<br />

that she cannot truly comprehend what would be happening. Her ‘hunger feeles not what<br />

he eates’, and yet, when Jesus feeds, he will feed all. The final couplet in this poem<br />

inverts what motherly sacrifice and feeding is about. The male Jesus will have a ‘Teat’ for<br />

suckling, and at it his mother will find nourishment. This ‘bloody one’ that will arrive<br />

‘e’re long’ for the woman, and all of Christ’s followers, is a ghastly, yet theologically<br />

sound and profound, reminder of just what comes with the belief in a religion that requires<br />

God to become incarnate in the flesh, and then to die for them. Further, he dies for<br />

humanity, and from him, humanity must find their life. Crashaw is playing with an<br />

amazing amount of concepts in these two lines of verse. First, he graphically portrays<br />

Christ providing sustenance for his followers. He then shows Mother Mary as indebted to,<br />

and inferior to, her son, because she must ultimately be ‘Tabled at [his] Teates’. He is<br />

even using the concept of the Galenic view of the body in which mother’s milk was<br />

believed to be a form of blood. 50<br />

Mary may have provided the infant Jesus with life<br />

through her transformed blood as he sucked at her breasts, but Jesus provides her with a<br />

transformed life through having her suck undiluted blood from his body. He offers life<br />

eternal through an unmediated access to his life blood as it flows from teats that have been<br />

violently created on his body. And finally, the baseness of the language, the ‘paps’ and<br />

‘Teates’ and ‘suck’, force the reader to confront the reality of the beliefs underpinning both<br />

salvation and a transubstantiated communion meal with Jesus. While it is very tempting to<br />

read a criticism of both Mary and transubstantiation in these verses due to the poems direct<br />

and harsh language, I do not believe that this is what Crashaw intends us to do. I believe<br />

that these unsettling lines are also calls to celebration. Only one woman could be so<br />

blessed as to nurse the Incarnation, but all can, and must, suck the bloody body of the<br />

crucified and risen Lord. Mary was truly blessed to have Jesus at her breast, as we see<br />

50 Michael C. Schoenfeldt, Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England (Cambridge, 1999), p. 26.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!