10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cork<br />

‘Lisnagun’ (Darrary td.), Co. Cork<br />

Early Medieval Settlement Enclosure<br />

Grid Ref: W41814211 (141819/042115)<br />

SMR No: CO135-031001<br />

Excavation Licence: E424<br />

Excavation Duration/Year: August 1987; August 1989<br />

Site Director: J. O’Sullivan (University College Cork)<br />

Lisnagun is a univallate enclosure situated on a gentle south-eastern slope at 60m OD, which<br />

was excavated as part of a community initiative by the Clonakilty Macra na Feirme.<br />

Excavation revealed evidence for a central round house, various outbuildings, three<br />

souterrains and other structures and features, but the phasing of the site was very difficult to<br />

establish as modern ridge and furrow cultivation had truncated almost all the features and<br />

stratigraphic evidence.<br />

Possible stakeholes, pits and a shallow interrupted ditch were discovered beneath the<br />

enclosure banks. <strong>The</strong> ditch had steep sides and a U-shaped base and measured 1.3m wide<br />

and 0.5m deep. A rock-cut trench also traversed the outer south-eastern entrance area. <strong>The</strong><br />

evidence was too slight to establish whether these features at Lisnagun represented part of a<br />

pre-enclosure field system or the remains of an earlier settlement enclosure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> surviving enclosure had an external diameter of 53m and an internal diameter of 35m.<br />

Where it survived, a low broad counterscarp bank, 0.5m high and 1.4m wide was identified<br />

outside the ditch. <strong>The</strong> main bank survived to a max height of 1.4m over the original ground<br />

surface. Its inner face was revetted by a low rubble dry-stone wall (0.65m high), along its<br />

eastern and southern sectors. <strong>The</strong> ditch was V-shaped in profile with a flat base and<br />

measured between 3.0m and 5.0m wide and up to 2m deep. Transient hearths, identified by<br />

thin spreads of charcoal over scorched soils or settings of stones, were revealed in the base<br />

of the ditch.<br />

<strong>The</strong> entrance was located along the south-eastern sector of the enclosure and had been<br />

remodelled at least once. Its terminals were retained by a low dry-stone wall which formed a<br />

narrow two meter opening. An area of gravel paving was also associated with this entranceway.<br />

An earlier entrance arrangement which possibly formed an entrance screen and<br />

gateway was identified beneath the gravel-paving and took the form of a substantial trench<br />

(1.2m wide and 0.9m deep) filled with large packing stones and two adjacent large postholes.<br />

A possible round house, defined by a shallow circular gully or trench (0.15m deep and with<br />

an overall diameter of 5.7m), was excavated in the centre of the enclosure. No entrance,<br />

structural features or hearths were recovered though its central location does support its<br />

interpretation as a round house. A concentration of stakeholes and linear slot-trenches were<br />

excavated in the area adjacent to the inner face of the enclosure bank on either side of the<br />

primary entrance. <strong>The</strong>se were interpreted as small rectilinear outbuildings with floor plans of<br />

between six and eight square metres (Fig. 76).<br />

Three earth-cut souterrains were excavated in the interior of the site and typically comprised<br />

a series of low barrel-vaulted chambers connected by narrow creep-ways and ventilated by<br />

stone air ducts. Burnt sediments, probably hearth debris, from the backfilled entrance to<br />

Souterrain I yielded a radiocarbon date spanning the late-ninth/tenth centuries and was<br />

regarded as a terminus ante quem date for the construction of the souterrain.<br />

<strong>The</strong> location of the entrance of two of the souterrains (I and III) within the circumference of<br />

the gully of the possible round house, tentatively suggests that at least one may have been<br />

entered from this structure. As round houses are less common after the tenth century (Lynn<br />

1978), It is quite possible that the round house and Souterrain I were associated with each<br />

other and in use during the ninth century.<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!