10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Limerick<br />

was faced with stone. <strong>The</strong>re were partial traces of occupation deposits, but these were<br />

substantially destroyed by later agriculture.<br />

Cush 8 consists of the partial surviving remains of a trivallate enclosure to the north of Cush<br />

7. Two stone-lined souterrains were located at the south and north end of the site. <strong>The</strong><br />

southern souterrain was 10m long with a ventilation passage, 4.9m long, at its southern end.<br />

<strong>The</strong> northern souterrain consisted of a straight stone-lined structure 7m long with a timberbuilt<br />

entrance approach defined by four postholes. Two groups of postholes in the interior<br />

give evidence for structures. One group east of the northern souterrain defined a roughly<br />

rectangular structure with an associated hearth. Another group of postholes west of the<br />

northern end of the southern souterrain defined a structure of unidentified shape. <strong>The</strong> partial<br />

remains of a circular wattle-built structure defined by arcs of stakeholes were also excavated<br />

to the east of the southern souterrain. <strong>The</strong> remainder of the structure was not locatedpossibly<br />

due to disturbance caused either by the construction of the rectangular post-built<br />

house or the southern souterrain. Two postholes, about 1.5m apart, were revealed along the<br />

southern side of the enclosure and were interpreted as part of an entranceway. Finds from<br />

the site included two bronze ring-headed pins.<br />

Cush 9 consists of a small section of bank and ditch in the form of an arc extending between<br />

Cush 8 and Cush 10. <strong>The</strong> arc may possibly form part of an enclosure though alternatively it<br />

may instead have been built to connect up the two enclosures for defensive or agricultural<br />

purposes. Accepting the later interpretation, the connecting arc of this site may have been<br />

built perhaps at the same time as the defences of Cush 8 and Cush 10 were strengthened.<br />

Except for a few postholes, there were no structural remains associated with the site.<br />

Cush 10 consists of a trivallate enclosure, north of Cush 9. Part of the enclosing defences was<br />

removed by a modern field fence. A series of wall-trenches within the interior outlined a<br />

number of rectilinear features. Another curved wall-trench was excavated at the east side of<br />

the end a souterrain and appears to have formed part of a protecting structure. At least one<br />

of these structures appears to have been in use after the souterrain had silted-up.<br />

A series of elongated rectangular field systems were identified at Cush running west-east<br />

down the hillside to the enclosures. <strong>The</strong> field boundaries were delineated by U-shaped<br />

ditches, 0.90m deep and a low bank surviving to a height of 0.45m. In contrast to the<br />

modern field systems, these field boundaries respected the outlines of the early medieval<br />

enclosures and appear to be roughly contemporary with or at least date to the later stages of<br />

the occupation of the enclosures. Test excavations identified that the field boundary trenches<br />

either cut into or stopped immediately short of the enclosures ditches, leading Ó Riordáin to<br />

suggest that the field boundaries had been dug while the enclosure ditches were still unsilted<br />

and in use.<br />

Excavations within the area of the ‘western field’ identified further east-west silted-up ditches,<br />

interpreted as field boundaries which pre-dated the ditches and banks of the rectangular<br />

‘enclosure’ site to their east. This evidence suggests that the bank and ditch of the<br />

rectangular ‘enclosure’ was built after the enclosures and a number of the field systems were<br />

laid out. <strong>The</strong> boundaries of the rectangular enclosure do appear to have been integrated into<br />

this system of ancient fields as its ditch and bank were aligned with two field boundaries on<br />

the eastern side of the southern group of enclosures as well as one of the early ditches in the<br />

‘western’ field. A block of ridge and furrow made by a heavy plough with a fixed mouldboard<br />

was also identified running roughly east-west across part of the rectangular enclosure. Its<br />

age could not be determined but it could also be possibly associated with these field systems.<br />

General finds from the site included around thirty fragments of jet bracelets, four iron knives,<br />

iron nails and over fifty whet-stones- the greatest number from Cush 4. Three possible<br />

rubbers of saddle querns and a considerable quantity of rotary querns fragments- Cush10<br />

(26), Cush 1 (12), Cush 5 (9), Cush 3 and Cush 4 (7 each), House B (6), Cush 9 (3) and Cush<br />

6 (3) were also recovered. Sixteen pounds of iron slag was also recovered mainly from Cush<br />

369

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!