10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Meath<br />

Lagore (Lagore Big td.), Co. Meath<br />

Early Medieval Crannog<br />

Grid reference: N98615284 (298619/252846)<br />

SMR No: ME038-027<br />

Excavation License No: N/A<br />

Excavation duration/Year: 1934; 1935; 1936.<br />

Site director: H. O’N. Hencken (Harvard Archaeological Expedition)<br />

Lagore crannog, Co. Meath, was first discovered in 1839, when local labourers digging a<br />

drainage ditch exposed wooden structures, huge amounts of animal bone and numerous<br />

finds of metalwork at the site. <strong>The</strong> subsequent antiquarian investigations at Lagore can safely<br />

be considered to mark the beginnings of research on Irish crannogs. <strong>The</strong> site was later<br />

excavated by the Harvard Archaeological Expedition between 1934 and 1936. <strong>The</strong><br />

stratigraphy of the crannog was complex and badly obscured by the earlier diggings, so that<br />

its dating and structures have been the subject of much re-interpretation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> crannog survived as a large mound measuring 41m across, consisting of 3m thickness of<br />

peat, brushwood and timber, located at the eastern end of a now drained lake (Fig. 242).<br />

Lagore crannog was occupied between the seventh and early eleventh centuries A.D. and<br />

historical sources have traditionally been used to identify it as the actual historical site Loch<br />

Gabor, the early medieval residence of the kings of Brega of the southern Uí Néill.<br />

Archaeologists have in the past attempted to put the date of the start of Lagore back before<br />

the fifth century A.D., but most recent commentators have accepted the seventh-century<br />

origins for the site.<br />

Lagore crannog was certainly occupied over a long period, re-constructed and re-built on<br />

several occasions. <strong>The</strong>re is good evidence for some late Bronze Age activity on the site,<br />

although this is difficult to clarify. Hencken, strongly influenced by the constraints of the<br />

historical references, identified three separate, chronological, consecutive palisades of firstly<br />

piles, then posts and finally planks. Lynn has suggested there were even more phases of<br />

occupation. <strong>The</strong> palisades probably defined the outer defences of the crannog.<br />

Hencken suggested that the crannog builders firstly placed a layer of animal bone,<br />

brushwood and peat on the lakebed, to use as a foundation to work from in building the main<br />

crannog. This layer he designated as his Period 1a, which he considered, preceded the use of<br />

the crannog proper. Lynn has suggested that the Period 1a material is itself evidence of a<br />

lake settlement, rather than the debris and working platform of crannog builders. This<br />

occupation phase, compacted and driven into the lake muds by the weight of the later<br />

crannog, may have had houses, hearths, piles, wooden platforms, brushwood and wattle<br />

mats and occupation debris. This earliest phase of occupation produced some Roman pottery<br />

(including Terra Sigilata) and post-Roman material. <strong>The</strong> latter included seventh-century<br />

pottery, an iron sword, a seventh-century gold ornament and a seventh to eighth-century<br />

horse bit. Period Ib was taken by Hencken to represent the first main phase of occupation,<br />

but it probably was just one of several successive phases after the first occupation. Period 1b<br />

produced Romano-British pottery, evidence for a seventh to eighth century work-shop for<br />

making glass studs and a seventh-eighth century bronze disc.<br />

Liam Price’s historical research was to strongly influence Hencken’s interpretations of the<br />

chronology of the site. He believed that historical references to the destruction of the crannog<br />

could be identified in the archaeological record. He thought that the Period I occupation was<br />

abandoned after the event referred to in the Annals of Ulster for A.D. 850, when Cinaed son<br />

of Conaing, King of Cianancht rebelled against Mael Sechnaill, plundered the Uí Néill and<br />

‘deceitfully sacked the island of Loch Gabor, levelling it to the ground’ (corro ort innsi Locha<br />

Gabur dolose corbo comardd fria lar), while also burning the nearby church of Treóit. Period<br />

II and Period III produced few finds to enable close dating of the site. Hencken felt that the<br />

Period II occupation probably ended with the destruction by Lagore described by the Annals<br />

of Ulster for A.D. 934 when ‘the island of Loch Gabor was sacked by Amlaíb, grandson of<br />

494

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!