10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dublin<br />

Glebe (Site 43), Co. Dublin<br />

Early Medieval Settlement Enclosure<br />

Grid reference: O22892362 (322892/223620)<br />

SMR: N/A<br />

Excavation Licence No: 00E0758<br />

Excavation duration: August 2000 – May 2002<br />

Site director: M. Seaver (Valerie J. Keeley Ltd.)<br />

Excavations at Glebe – in advance of the construction of a road interchange – revealed a circular<br />

early medieval enclosed settlement and associated field system dating between the late seventh and<br />

late ninth centuries AD. Slightly earlier cereal processing was also evident in the form of four cerealdrying<br />

kilns. <strong>The</strong> enclosure was situated on a steep scarp, on the townland boundary between Glebe<br />

and Laughanstown, and on rich agricultural land.<br />

Four ‘figure-of-eight’ cereal-drying kilns were situated to the west of the enclosed settlement in the<br />

townland of Laughanstown. Two returned radiocarbon dates between the mid sixth and mid seventh<br />

centuries, which probably places this agricultural activity before the construction of the settlement<br />

enclosure (see below for radiocarbon dates).<br />

<strong>The</strong> enclosure measured 46m in internal diameter and had an entrance at the south-east (Fig. 121).<br />

Large slabs and boulders within the ditch on either side of the entrance suggest that the bank on<br />

either side was revetted with stone. <strong>The</strong> enclosing ditch contained large quantities of animal bone<br />

and evidence for butchery was recorded on the three main domesticates of cattle, sheep and pig.<br />

Middens of seashell show that the inhabitants utilised the nearby sea shore which was approximately<br />

3km away to the east. A portion of the bank survived on the western side while there was evidence<br />

for a post-built fence or palisade on the northern side of the enclosure. <strong>The</strong> latter was possibly<br />

constructed after erosion of the bank.<br />

<strong>The</strong> interior was heavily ploughed but a cluster of postholes, a hearth and a pit, measuring 8m by<br />

5m, were identified off-centre. <strong>The</strong>y may possibly denote the area of a former dwelling.<br />

A reasonable number of artefacts were recovered from the site including ringed pin fragments, bone<br />

pins (including an unusual zoomorphic example with the head stylised as a horse’s head), a bone<br />

scoop with dot and spiral decoration, blue glass beads, a stone spindle whorl, a broken rotary quern<br />

and iron slag. Possible ecclesiastical connections, with the nearby monastic site at Tully, were<br />

indicated by the presence of inscribed worked pieces of wood. One piece featured a raised cross<br />

while another contained an inscription of the word ‘Deo’ and a chi-rho symbol. <strong>The</strong>se motif pieces<br />

may indicate that the inhabitants were involved in the manufacture and decoration of church<br />

manuscripts or artefacts.<br />

Two smaller ditches radiated from the enclosure to the south and represented field enclosures. <strong>The</strong><br />

curving hedgerow of the townland boundary complemented one of these which demonstrates an<br />

associated field system and suggests the early medieval antiquity of townland divisions. When the<br />

two field ditches were taken together they formed a petal-shaped field enclosure. Material from a<br />

posthole marking one of the boundaries was dated between the late seventh and late ninth centuries.<br />

226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!