10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dublin<br />

a continuation of Ditch C and it also probably had a related stone-revetted bank. <strong>The</strong> ratio of the<br />

three main animal domesticates was similar to Phase II.<br />

2. Early Medieval Unenclosed Souterrain Complex<br />

<strong>The</strong> Phase III outer enclosure enclosed two souterrains while a further five were located further<br />

downhill from the hilltop enclosure. <strong>The</strong> enclosed souterrains may relate to this phase or, alternatively<br />

and more likely, they all belong to Phase IV.<br />

Phase IV consisted of occupation at Rosepark from the ninth century until the arrival of the Anglo-<br />

Normans. <strong>The</strong> souterrains possibly represent a movement from enclosed to open settlement at this<br />

point and it appears that the hilltop enclosure was abandoned by the eighth or ninth centuries. Some<br />

of the souterrains were used, after their abandonment, as cereal-drying kilns. Kilns nearby at Glebe<br />

South were radiocarbon dated between the early eleventh and thirteenth centuries. It could<br />

tentatively be suggested that the souterrains at Rosepark were utilised between the ninth and tenth<br />

centuries before their abandonment. Some were thereafter reused as cereal-drying kilns<br />

contemporary with cereal processing at Glebe South.<br />

Fig. 123: Phase I at Rosepark, Co. Dublin (after Carroll 2008, 24).<br />

232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!