10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Tipperary<br />

stones, apparently the bottom course of a rough wall, survived on its west side and one<br />

shallow posthole was found against its east side near the northern end. This feature is later<br />

than House 1 and may represent the remains of a robbed out souterrain.<br />

A pit-like feature, identified as a possible corn-drying kiln, cut into the inner slope of the<br />

southern enclosure ditch (Cutting 1) and contained a black layer of carbonized grain similar to<br />

that recovered inside the fill of the enclosing ditch. A double row of stones running west<br />

along the ditch may represent the demolished remains of the kiln’s flue. A calibrated 2Σ<br />

radiocarbon date from the grain dated the kiln to A.D. 937-1172 (see below).<br />

A number of other early pits and a hearth were uncovered within the various cuttings (2, 4<br />

and 6) within the enclosure interior. One shallow irregular depression in cutting 4 contained a<br />

quantity of charcoal and iron slag and indicates ironworking on site. An undated standing<br />

stone situated in the centre of the site (Cutting 2) was held in place by packing stones inside<br />

a large shallow oblong pit (0.75m maximum depth).<br />

Two parallel low banks (20m apart) with external ditches ran westwards from the oval<br />

enclosure and may have formed part of some type of enclosure annex. <strong>The</strong> ditches were<br />

comparable both in size and fill to the main enclosure ditch and maybe roughly<br />

contemporary. Finds from the ditch included a small E ware pottery vessel recovered in a redeposited<br />

context in an upper fill and a small fragment of iron.<br />

<strong>The</strong> southern bank of the annex cut across a long straight re-cut narrow trench (0.8-1m wide<br />

and 0.6m deep) which continued in both directions for 20m beyond the excavation area. A<br />

small piece of iron slag was the only find recovered from this feature. Four cultivation furrows<br />

inside the annex appear to be later than the annex banks.<br />

<strong>The</strong> post-medieval cemetery consisted of roughly 80 excavated burials; all from within the<br />

eastern two thirds of the enclosure interior and none related to the standing stone. Burials<br />

rarely disturbed each other suggesting that they were marked by upright stones or slabs. <strong>The</strong><br />

burials cut across earlier pits, postholes and other features and shroud pins and a clay pipe<br />

from a number of graves confirm a post-medieval date.<br />

Evidence for spinning and weaving on the site was suggested by the perforated stone disc<br />

(thread separator) inside House 1 as well as two spindle-whorls from the site. Iron smelting is<br />

also indicated by the recovery of slag though no furnace was uncovered. <strong>The</strong> small<br />

fragmentary faunal assemblage comprised cattle, pig, sheep or goat, wild game and a red<br />

deer antler fragment. Wheat and oats were grown and were ground with querns recovered<br />

from the site.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two main chronological divisions consisted of an early medieval occupational phase and a<br />

mainly post-medieval burial phase. <strong>The</strong> piece of E ware indicates that the site was occupied<br />

from at least the sixth/mid seventh century A.D. Continued early medieval occupation is<br />

indicated by the circular houses, the later possible souterrain and the tenth-twelfth century<br />

kiln.<br />

<strong>The</strong> enclosure is about twice the size as the typical ‘ringfort’ and is more comparable to the<br />

dimensions of ecclesiastical enclosures. <strong>The</strong> lack of any church, definite early burials or crossslabs<br />

might suggest that it was not ecclesiastical though the limited nature of excavation<br />

cannot preclude their existence. <strong>The</strong> parish of ‘Kildadrum’ (1302-06) and Kyllydiradruim<br />

(1450) was recorded in two medieval sources though its absence from the Civil Survey (1659)<br />

might imply that ‘this was a parish in name only with no actual church structure’.<br />

<strong>The</strong> re-use of long abandoned sites for worship and burial by the Catholic community after<br />

the Reformation is not uncommon and could explain the post-medieval cemetery. Though<br />

marked as a graveyard called ‘Killederdadrum’ in the first edition (1841) O.S. map, the<br />

574

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!