10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Kerry<br />

Dromthacker, Co. Kerry<br />

Early Medieval Settlement Enclosure<br />

Grid Ref: Q85911623 (085917/116236)<br />

SMR No: KE029-095<br />

Excavation Licence: 97E0022<br />

Excavation Duration/Year: 1997<br />

Site Director: R.M. Cleary (University College, Cork)<br />

An excavation at Dromthacker in advance of a new university campus at Tralee revealed a<br />

univallate enclosure with two internal buildings preceded by an unenclosed settlement<br />

associated with a small structure and gully. <strong>The</strong> site was situated on the south-westerly face<br />

of a gradually rising ridge (58m OD) between the Big River and a tributary of the River Lee.<br />

Pre-enclosure activity was indicated by a series of postholes, stakeholes and pits on the<br />

eastern side of the site. <strong>The</strong> post and stakes defined a structure 3.8m by 3m. An internal pit<br />

and a paved surface, which extended from the interior of the building to the east, were also<br />

located. This paved area was cut by a gully (14.6m long by 0.9m wide and 0.4m deep) and<br />

was interpreted as a drain for keeping the environs of the building dry. A hone-stone was<br />

recovered from the paved surface, while two others were also identified within the fill of the<br />

gully. Charcoal from the gully produced a radiocarbon date range in the fifth/sixth century<br />

(see below).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Phase 1 unenclosed settlement (Fig. 159) was overlain by an introduced clay layer which<br />

was interpreted as a levelling-up of part of the site prior to the construction of the Phase 2<br />

oval enclosure (19m by 24m internally). <strong>The</strong> enclosure bank survived to a maximum height of<br />

0.75m and maximum width of 2.25m. <strong>The</strong> ditch associated with it was U-shaped with a<br />

surface width of 2.7m. <strong>The</strong>re was no indication of basal silting, indicating that the ditch was<br />

either cleaned out periodically or in-filled shortly after excavation; excavation revealed that it<br />

had been partially in-filled in antiquity.<br />

<strong>The</strong> original entrance was not located, and a south-eastern entrance blocked in the 1980s<br />

was associated with modern paving. Two pits and a posthole - supporting a possible gatepost<br />

- were excavated in this area, and were interpreted as a possible original entrance,<br />

however the ditch was however continuous in this area and these features may represent<br />

pre-enclosure activity. <strong>The</strong> pits were bowl-shaped and contained iron slag, charcoal and fireshattered<br />

stones. One also contained partly vitrified clay, possibly belonging to the clay<br />

surrounding a tuyère.<br />

Phase 2 occupation was mainly confined to the eastern and southern sections of the<br />

enclosure interior and had surviving remains of at least two post-built buildings with internal<br />

stakeholes (Fig. 160). Structure 1 was located in the south-east and had an estimated<br />

internal diameter of 7.5m. A stone-spread on the south-western side was interpreted as<br />

marking the building’s entrance. Structure 2 was recorded 2m north-east of Structure 1. It<br />

was an oval-shaped building with an estimated long axis of 8.5m and contained an internal<br />

hearth.<br />

A series of external stakeholes and pits were excavated within the enclosure interior. One pit<br />

between the two structures (but on the same stratigraphic level) contained dumped<br />

ironworking material and charred plant remains. Charcoal from this pit produced a<br />

radiocarbon date range in the sixth/seventh century (see below). A pit in the northern area<br />

had evidence for in situ burning and contained burnt bone, saddle quern fragments, charcoal,<br />

iron slag, a bi-chrome glass bead and a blue glass bead.<br />

<strong>The</strong> radiocarbon dates from the two phases suggest that there was not any significant time<br />

interval between the initial unenclosed settlement and the subsequent construction of the<br />

enclosure and associated structures.<br />

301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!