10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kerry<br />

nineteenth century and it is possible that this part of the rampart had been removed in the<br />

late-nineteenth century.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rampart itself was constructed in two phases. Phase 1 involved the construction of the<br />

inner half of the wall which averaged 4.8m wide and 2.76m maximum height. Two corbelled<br />

chambers were incorporated into the walls on either side of the stone-lintelled entrance which<br />

measured 2m wide and 2.3m high. Phase 2 involved the addition of further supports to the<br />

entrance, the deepening of Ditch 1, and the construction of a dry-stone wall (up to 2.25m<br />

wide and 1.9m high) against the outer face of the Phase 1 rampart. <strong>The</strong> additional pressure<br />

of the Phase 2 exterior wall required the construction of a retaining wall along the internal<br />

(southern) side of the Phase 1 rampart, which was partially excavated and measured 2.3m<br />

deep and 2m wide.<br />

<strong>The</strong> remains of a central causeway partially survived between the defensive banks and<br />

ditches and were defined by upright orthostats at the edges of the banks and possible<br />

cobbled areas. Similar sized stones were recovered in the fill of the Ditch 1 terminus and it<br />

was suggested that these orthostats formed part of a complete series of pillars flanking the<br />

edges of the causeway.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dry-stone-built souterrain extends for some 16.5m in a south-west to north-east direction<br />

from within the stone rampart entrance out under the line of the entrance causeway and<br />

terminating 2m south of the outer face of Bank 2. Several section of the souterrain was<br />

excavated though no original earthen floor level or artefacts were recovered.<br />

A large dry-stone building (internal diameter of 7.5m) was excavated in the interior of the<br />

fort. Its walls were circular shaped externally and rectangular internally and are unlikely to<br />

have supported a corbelled roof. Its northwest lintelled doorway was linked with the rampart<br />

entrance by a flagged pathway, and the floor of the entrance was lined with several<br />

flagstones which extended for 1.40m into the interior of the building.<br />

Two phases of activity were identified within the stone building (Fig. 163). <strong>The</strong> Phase 1<br />

features consisted of a hearth, scatters of stakeholes, areas of burning, a shallow trench and<br />

a possible foundation trench for the southern wall. <strong>The</strong> hearth contained charcoal, animal<br />

bone and ash and was associated with a series of stakeholes, indicative of structural<br />

supports. <strong>The</strong> shallow trench (1m long and 0.2m wide) was located beside one of the areas<br />

of burning in the north-west quadrant and was full of charcoal. It was interpreted as the<br />

remains of an internal wattle-and-fence. Charcoal from the first period of activity produced a<br />

radiocarbon date range in the tenth/eleventh centuries (see below). It is possible that the<br />

first phase coincided with the construction of the building as there was no evidence for<br />

internal structural supports and it is unlikely that such a structure of such size supported a<br />

corbelled roof.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Phase 2 activity was more extensive and prolonged than Phase 1 and consisted of a<br />

habitation layer (indicated by charcoal, animal bone, and flints) concentrated around two<br />

central hearths as well as a pit along the southern wall, an area of flagstones inside the<br />

northern door and scatters of stakeholes and six-postholes across the interior, except for the<br />

north-eastern quadrant. <strong>The</strong> radiocarbon date from the charcoal from the habitation deposit<br />

suggests that both Phase 1 and 2 occupation layers were of short duration and occurred<br />

around the tenth century (see below). Finds from the second occupation comprised a<br />

possible quern stone and rough pestle and an undecorated stone spindle-whorl. A possible<br />

cleat nail was also located in the topsoil of a cutting inside the building.<br />

It was suggested that the building in Phase 2 was never completely roofed and that wooden<br />

lean-to structures were erected in the northwest, southeast and southwest corners of the<br />

building with two sides being supported by the top of the stone walls while the other sides<br />

were supported by wooden posts. Some of the stakeholes appear to have lined up with each<br />

other and could indicate the presence of wattle walls in the interior of these structures.<br />

305

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!