10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Antrim<br />

‘Brokerstown’ (Ballymacoss td.), Co. Antrim<br />

Early Medieval Settlement Enclosure Complex.<br />

Grid Ref: J23556509 (32355/36509)<br />

SMR No: ANT 068:007<br />

Excavation Licence: AE/06/202; AE/07/082; AE/07/194<br />

Excavation Duration/Year: 2006; 2007.<br />

Site Director: C. Dunlop (Northern Archaeological Consultancy).<br />

A possible enclosure had been identified by aerial photography in 1962 which necessitated<br />

archaeological monitoring of top-soil stripping prior to the construction of a housing<br />

development. A number of archaeological features were discovered during this process. <strong>The</strong><br />

most significant consisted of a circular enclosure (35m in diameter) with an adjoining annex<br />

(25m by 16m), and associated field boundaries (Fig. 16).<br />

<strong>The</strong> main enclosure was defined by a ditch (4m wide, and a maximum of 1.8m deep); no<br />

trace of a bank remained (Fig. 17). <strong>The</strong> remains of a rectangular house were found within<br />

this enclosure. <strong>The</strong> east and west walls of this structure were defined by two parallel linear<br />

slot-trenches (6.5m long); and the southern wall had two linear slot-trenches (2.5m long)<br />

with an intervening gap. A large, stone-filled posthole on the internal end of these slottrenches<br />

indicated the presence of substantial door posts. Four other large postholes,<br />

arranged in a square in the centre of the house, were used to support the roof. A hearth was<br />

located in the centre of the house, and this was surrounded by a series of stakeholes, which<br />

have been interpreted as a possible draft screen or temporary internal division. Another<br />

rectangular structure (3m by 4m) was located on the west side of this house. No connecting<br />

entranceway with the larger structure was identified, and it was suggested that this structure<br />

may have been entered through an external door. A drainage gully running through the<br />

smaller structure has led to the interpretation that this may have acted as an animal house.<br />

<strong>The</strong> smaller enclosure was defined by a ditch (maximum dimensions of 2m wide and 1m<br />

deep). <strong>The</strong> main feature identified from this enclosure was a curvilinear ditch which enclosed<br />

an area 10m in diameter. It is possible that this represents the drip-gully of a destroyed<br />

roundhouse. Several large pits of unknown function were also discovered in this enclosure.<br />

Quantities of iron slag found in the ditch of this annex suggest that this enclosure may have<br />

had an industrial function.<br />

A putative third enclosure existed to the north of the annex. This was partially defined by a<br />

ditch (1m wide and 0.6m deep), and has been interpreted as having been unfinished. <strong>The</strong><br />

decorated souterrain ware recovered from this ditch suggests that it was a later addition to<br />

the complex.<br />

Several early medieval field boundaries were identified around this enclosure, the longest of<br />

which ran for 120m; and two unenclosed early medieval houses, defined by a series of<br />

postholes (5m x 5m), were discovered outside the enclosure complex.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!