10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mayo<br />

This is similar to the metalworking areas at Moynagh Lough crannog, Co. Meath, which<br />

appear to have been to the right as a person entered the crannog.<br />

<strong>The</strong> crannog at Lough More is highly unusual in that it appears to have been entirely an<br />

ironworking site. <strong>The</strong> only structural evidence is the palisade and stone paving while the only<br />

finds are related to ironworking. <strong>The</strong>re are no traces of occupation structures or any other<br />

forms of domestic or industrial activity. <strong>The</strong> heavy concentration of slag, the presence of<br />

possible furnaces and the hollowed stones used as crushers suggests its inhabitants were<br />

smelting iron from the ores found in the nearby bogs. <strong>The</strong> present lake is coloured rusty red<br />

in the spring, and small quarries in the gravel ridge to the west end of the lake may be<br />

evidence for early open cast mining. <strong>The</strong>re is little other evidence for contemporary<br />

settlement in this immediate setting, although there are large numbers of ringforts and stone<br />

cashels in the landscape several miles to the northeast. Bofeenaun provides many contrasts<br />

with such larger sites as Moynagh Lough, Lagore and Ballinderry. It was entirely industrial in<br />

function, focused only on iron production from local ores. Furthermore, it seems to have been<br />

occupied only for a short duration, as there was little evidence for long-term occupation. It is<br />

also possible that it was not occupied at all, being only a work-site for people living elsewhere<br />

in the wider landscape. It confirms that not all crannogs were domestic occupations, many of<br />

the crannog cairns and small sites may also be industrial sites.<br />

Dendrochronological Dates:<br />

Sample<br />

Date<br />

Oak Timber A.D. 804±9<br />

References:<br />

Lawless, C. 1992. Lough More, Bofeenaun, Co. Mayo: crannog, fulachta fiadh, deer traps and<br />

associated archaeological sites. Cathair Na Mart 12, (1), 13–31.<br />

Keane, M. 1995. Lough More, Co. Mayo: the crannog. Irish Archaeological Wetland Unit<br />

Transactions, 4, 167–82.<br />

431

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!