10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Limerick<br />

Cush, Co. Limerick<br />

Early Medieval Enclosure Complex.<br />

Grid Ref: R69802580 (169800/125800)<br />

SMR No: LI048-034---<br />

Excavation Licence: E000010<br />

Excavation Duration/year: August-October 1934; July-September 1935<br />

Site Director: S.P. Ó Ríordáin (University College Cork)<br />

A significant early medieval landscape containing a large number of settlement enclosures,<br />

with internal occupation evidence, structures and souterrains, together with a complex<br />

pattern of rectangular field systems was excavated at Cush. <strong>The</strong> research excavations were<br />

undertaken between August-October 1934 and July-September 1935 and were financed<br />

under a state scheme for the relief of employment. <strong>The</strong> site (210-240m OD) was situated on<br />

the border of good agricultural land along the foothills of a northward extension of the<br />

Ballyhoura Hills (Slieve Reagh), commanding considerable views across the Limerick plain to<br />

the north. <strong>The</strong> site consisted of a southern group of enclosures, a northern group of<br />

enclosures, the western field, the related field systems and three prehistoric tumuli.<br />

<strong>The</strong> greater part of the interior of the enclosures was excavated as well as various sections<br />

through their ramparts and entrances. Also excavated were the three tumuli, various portions<br />

of the rectangular ‘enclosure’, a small area of the ‘western field’ and trial-trenches along the<br />

field boundaries. <strong>The</strong> enclosures generally produced relatively thin occupation deposits and<br />

this lack of stratigraphy hindered any detailed reconstruction of the sequence of and<br />

relationship between the various different internal features and structures- buildings and<br />

souterrains.<br />

Considerable evidence for Bronze Age burial activity was uncovered and comprised five<br />

cremation urn burials within the northwest sector of Cush 5 in the southern group, Tumulus I<br />

(to the south of Cush 7), and a small cist burial with two food vessels, just inside a section of<br />

the modern field fence dividing the ‘western field’ from that containing the tumuli. Ó Riordáin<br />

claimed that the burials inside Enclosure 5 were later than the occupation of the enclosure<br />

though the stratigraphic evidence to substantiate such a claim is neither completely clear nor<br />

detailed. Most recent commentators (e.g. Edwards 1996, 17) now believe that the enclosure<br />

is early medieval and was simply built in an area of prehistoric burial activity. Tumulus I<br />

revealed a primary long cist burial (1.9m by 0.6m internally) with a food vessel type pot<br />

beneath its original ground level. A kerbed mound (0.9m high and 11m in maximum<br />

diameter) was erected over this burial. Following this, an encrusted urn was placed near the<br />

centre of the mound and a ditch dug around the site. <strong>The</strong> mound was covered with a paving<br />

of small stones after the ditches had silted up, on which at least one cremated burial was<br />

placed.<br />

Iron Age burial activity was uncovered at the sites of Tumulus II and possibly Tumulus III.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se bowl barrows each measured about 1.8m high and 13.7m and 16.46m respectively in<br />

diameter with enclosing ditch. Spreads of charcoal mixed with fragments of cremated bone<br />

were uncovered on the old ground surface of tumulus II and was interpreted by the<br />

excavator as the site of a cremation fire. A small pit was found in one of the spreads filled<br />

with cremated bone and charcoal and contained near its top a small bone plaque with early<br />

Iron Age La Tène decoration (O’Kelly, 1989, 329-330). Tumulus II revealed a scatter of<br />

cremated bone on the old ground surface where a possible cremation pyre had been lit and<br />

over which the mound had been built.<br />

<strong>The</strong> early medieval activity comprised ten excavated ‘ringfort’ type enclosures, an adjoining<br />

rectangular ‘enclosure’ and a system of field boundaries. <strong>The</strong> southern group of enclosures<br />

cover three acres and consist of a six conjoined enclosures (1-6) associated with a subrectangular<br />

area ‘the enclosure’ delimited by a ditch and bank to the west (Fig. 191). <strong>The</strong><br />

excavations revealed that Cush 2, 3 and 4 were roughly contemporary but were preceded by<br />

Cush 1, while Cush 5 was built at a later stage, followed finally by Cush 6. <strong>The</strong> site known as<br />

366

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!