10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

EMAP_Progress_Reports_2009_2.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Waterford<br />

Though the archaeological evidence is lacking, it has been suggested that the tenth-century<br />

Dún may have contained a single main bisecting street from the river front to Cathedral<br />

Square with the main west gateway on the crest of a roughly east-west ridge to the north of<br />

the cathedral.<br />

<strong>The</strong> settlement expanded to the west in the eleventh and twelfth centuries with the formal<br />

layout of three east-west streets- High Street, Peter Street and Lady Lane- outside the<br />

postulated original nucleus. <strong>The</strong> east-west crest of the ridge broadened out to the west and<br />

contained the three streets with the break in slope occurring north of High Street and south<br />

of Lady’s Lane.<br />

A 16m length of the original mid/late-eleventh-century metalled surface of Peter Street was<br />

excavated (Scully & McCutcheon 1997, 55). <strong>The</strong> road was laid directly on the old ground<br />

surface and appears to have been contemporary with the earliest level (mid-eleventh<br />

century) of houses. <strong>The</strong> street was considerably damaged by a modern service trench though<br />

may have been approximately 3.6m wide originally. <strong>The</strong> excavated portion of the street was<br />

subsequently covered by a build-up of organic material and was never substantially<br />

resurfaced.<br />

<strong>The</strong> three main east-west streets were crossed by three or four north south bisecting streets<br />

and lanes which continued downslope to the banks of the River Suir where ships were<br />

presumably docked. Type 4 sunken buildings were excavated adjacent to the modern northsouth<br />

Olaf street and could tentatively indicate a laneway of late eleventh century date<br />

(Hurley 1997b, 9-10).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a considerable corpus of excavated pathways associated with plot boundaries and<br />

buildings. Over half of the Waterford Type 1 houses contained pathways, particularly outside<br />

the back doors. <strong>The</strong>se pathways to the rear of the buildings were best preserved and<br />

consisted of a variety of material including gravel, wattle mats, limestone slabs and timber<br />

(Scully 1997a, 37).<br />

<strong>The</strong> paths at the front of the houses were not as long as those to the rear, owing to the<br />

proximity of these houses to the streets (Scully 1997a, 37). Modern service trenches had<br />

unfortunately truncated the front of most of the street-fronting Type 1 buildings though two<br />

buildings at Peter Street revealed short paths connecting the houses to the streets.<br />

PLOTS AND FENCES<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a general dearth of boundary fences at Scandinavian Waterford in contrast to the<br />

abundant evidence from Dublin (Scully & McCutcheon 1997, 106). <strong>The</strong> location and evolution<br />

of plot boundaries at Waterford seems to have been more fluid than excavated examples in<br />

Scandinavian Dublin which were rigidly adhered to throughout the centuries (Wallace 1992,<br />

47). <strong>The</strong> plot boundaries at Waterford were divided by post-and-wattle fences.<br />

Fourteen contiguous plot boundaries were excavated at Peter Street (E639, E527, E406 and<br />

E434) along an area almost 90m long, each plot containing the superimposed strata of at<br />

least twelve levels of houses dating from the mid-eleventh to early fourteenth century (Scully<br />

& McCutcheon 1997, 53-137). <strong>The</strong> plots were not all occupied at any one time and the<br />

property boundaries changed slightly through the centuries.<br />

Where the plot boundaries were excavated, they were usually confined to the vicinity of the<br />

backyard houses with rarely any evidence for boundary divisions between street-fronting<br />

houses (Scully & McCutcheon 1997, 54 & 106). <strong>The</strong> Type 2 houses in the backyards of the<br />

earlier levels at Peter Street were also found to often transgress the boundary of previous<br />

plots indicating that plot boundaries locations were not always strictly adhered to. One rare<br />

excavated plot fence at Peter Street was uncovered in Level 1 (mid-eleventh century) and<br />

was associated with a log track-way of horizontally-laid oaks (Scully & McCutcheon 1997, 54).<br />

614

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!