19.01.2014 Views

sexual health and human rights in the african region - The ICHRP

sexual health and human rights in the african region - The ICHRP

sexual health and human rights in the african region - The ICHRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eform that had been tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. In 2007, follow<strong>in</strong>g a process of<br />

research <strong>and</strong> consultation by <strong>the</strong> South African Law Commission, 406 <strong>the</strong> South<br />

African Parliament had passed <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Law (Sexual Offences <strong>and</strong> Related<br />

Matters) Act. 407 Sections 15 <strong>and</strong> 16 of this Act repeal section 14 of <strong>the</strong> Sexual<br />

Offences Act of 1957 <strong>and</strong> set 16 years as <strong>the</strong> uniform age of consent for all<br />

consensual <strong>sexual</strong> activities. <strong>The</strong> Supreme Court of Appeal also took judicial<br />

notice of <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> majority of countries outside South Africa had set a<br />

uniform average age of 16 years as <strong>the</strong> age of consent for same-sex <strong>and</strong><br />

hetero<strong>sexual</strong> Acts. 408<br />

[30] <strong>The</strong> Geldenhuys case is a positive contribution towards promotion of <strong>sexual</strong><br />

<strong>health</strong> as a <strong>human</strong> right. It seeks to reconcile <strong>the</strong> imperative of recogniz<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

children are a group that is vulnerable <strong>and</strong> thus ought to be protected from<br />

<strong>sexual</strong> exploitation with a concomitant recognition that some children are <strong>in</strong> fact<br />

capable of mak<strong>in</strong>g autonomous decisions about <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>sexual</strong>ity <strong>and</strong> express<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir <strong>sexual</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> <strong>sexual</strong> activities. In this sense, <strong>the</strong> decision is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong><br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of <strong>the</strong> evolv<strong>in</strong>g capacities of a child that is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> article 5 of <strong>the</strong><br />

Convention on <strong>the</strong> Rights of <strong>the</strong> Child. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> decision is significant<br />

for re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> imperative of recogniz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> equality of diverse <strong>sexual</strong>ities<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> undesirability of perpetuat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alization <strong>and</strong> stigmatization of<br />

gay <strong>and</strong> lesbian <strong>sexual</strong>ity.<br />

[31] At a more general level, Geldenhuys demonstrates clear will<strong>in</strong>gness by a South<br />

African appellate court to develop common law <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> spirit <strong>and</strong> objects<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Constitution. <strong>The</strong> decision of <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court of Appeal <strong>in</strong> Geldenhuys<br />

has been consolidated by a provision of <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Law (Sexual Offences <strong>and</strong><br />

Related Matters) Amendment Act which puts <strong>the</strong> rule laid down by <strong>the</strong> case on<br />

an express statutory foot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> repeals section 14 of <strong>the</strong> Sexual Offences Act.<br />

[32] In terms of statutory reform of age of consent, Section 15 of <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Law<br />

(Sexual Offences <strong>and</strong> Related Matters) Amendment Act No 32 of 2007 409 makes it<br />

an offence for a person to commit an act of <strong>sexual</strong> penetration with a ‘child’, that<br />

is a person who is at least twelve years but has not yet atta<strong>in</strong>ed sixteen years.<br />

Consent on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> child is irrelevant. This is not an entirely new offence<br />

as statutory rape was recognized before <strong>the</strong> Act. What <strong>the</strong> new Act does,<br />

however, as alluded to earlier <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> discussion on <strong>the</strong> Geldenhuys case is to<br />

remove <strong>the</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>atory anomaly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> provision of different ages for male<br />

406 South African Law Commission Sexual Offences Aga<strong>in</strong>st Children Issue Paper 10 (Project 108) Pretoria:<br />

South African Law Commission (1997); South African Law Commission Sexual Offences: Substantive Law<br />

Discussion Paper 85 (Project 107) Pretoria: South African Law Commission (1999).<br />

407 Act No 32.<br />

408 Geldenhuys v <strong>The</strong> State para 61.<br />

409 <strong>The</strong> broader purview of this Act is discussed <strong>in</strong> section 5.2 below.<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!