19.01.2014 Views

sexual health and human rights in the african region - The ICHRP

sexual health and human rights in the african region - The ICHRP

sexual health and human rights in the african region - The ICHRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[51] Islamic Shari’ah aside, crim<strong>in</strong>alization of adultery is a rarity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> postcolonial<br />

African state. Among <strong>the</strong> countries surveyed, Cameroon is an exception to <strong>the</strong><br />

rule. Section 361 of <strong>the</strong> Cameroonian Penal Codes crim<strong>in</strong>alizes adultery for both<br />

husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> wife. A husb<strong>and</strong> commits <strong>the</strong> offence only if he ‘habitually’<br />

commits adultery whereas a wife need only commit adultery once. 530 Clearly,<br />

Cameroonian law is discrim<strong>in</strong>atory on <strong>the</strong> ground of sex.<br />

[52] As discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2 of this study, prior to judicial reform, Ug<strong>and</strong>an<br />

divorce law discrim<strong>in</strong>ated aga<strong>in</strong>st women <strong>in</strong> divorce cases where adultery was <strong>in</strong><br />

issue. In Ug<strong>and</strong>a Association of Women Lawyers <strong>and</strong> O<strong>the</strong>rs v <strong>The</strong> Attorney General 531<br />

<strong>the</strong> Constitutional Court of Ug<strong>and</strong>a held that provisions of <strong>the</strong> Ug<strong>and</strong>an Divorce<br />

Act which treated men <strong>and</strong> women differently contravened <strong>the</strong> equality clause -<br />

article 21 - of <strong>the</strong> Constitution of Ug<strong>and</strong>a on <strong>the</strong> basis of sex <strong>and</strong> gender. <strong>The</strong><br />

provisions <strong>in</strong> question required more by way of proof from a wife where she<br />

alleged <strong>the</strong> husb<strong>and</strong>’s adultery that was <strong>the</strong> case where <strong>the</strong> husb<strong>and</strong> was alleg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> wife’s adultery. Also, <strong>the</strong> provisions conferred on <strong>the</strong> husb<strong>and</strong> only a right to<br />

claim damages from <strong>the</strong> co-respondent. In hold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> provision to be<br />

discrim<strong>in</strong>atory, <strong>the</strong> Court said that equality was a core value under <strong>the</strong><br />

Constitution of Ug<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> provisions <strong>in</strong> question were a colonial<br />

vestige that reflect a time when <strong>the</strong> concept of family was patriarchal <strong>and</strong> women<br />

where subservient to men.<br />

[53] In Law Advocacy for Women <strong>in</strong> Ug<strong>and</strong>a v Attorney General, 532 <strong>the</strong> Constitutional<br />

Court of Ug<strong>and</strong>a held that section 154 of <strong>the</strong> Ug<strong>and</strong>an Penal Code which treated<br />

men <strong>and</strong> women differently <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itional elements of adultery was<br />

discrim<strong>in</strong>atory on <strong>the</strong> basis of sex <strong>and</strong> gender as to contravene, <strong>in</strong>ter alia, article<br />

21 of <strong>the</strong> Constitution of Ug<strong>and</strong>a. <strong>The</strong> relevant provision provided that ‘any man<br />

who has <strong>sexual</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercourse with any married woman not be<strong>in</strong>g his wife commits<br />

adultery’, while on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong> it provided that ‘any married woman who<br />

had <strong>sexual</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercourse with any man not be<strong>in</strong>g her husb<strong>and</strong> commits adultery’.<br />

<strong>The</strong> provision privileged males <strong>in</strong> that adultery could only be committed if <strong>the</strong><br />

co-adulterer was a married woman.<br />

[54] Under Shari’ah, as practised by states <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part of Nigeria, adultery –<br />

Z<strong>in</strong>a 533 - is an offence which is punishable by death with ston<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> sentence of<br />

death for adultery has been passed <strong>in</strong> a number of cases though it has never been<br />

carried out. Two examples can be given. In Commissioner of Police Sokoto v<br />

530 Section 361 of <strong>the</strong> Penal Code (Cameroon).<br />

531 Ug<strong>and</strong>a Association of Women Lawyers <strong>and</strong> O<strong>the</strong>rs v <strong>The</strong> Attorney General, Constitutional Petition No 2 of<br />

2003 (2004) 1 (Constitutional Court of Ug<strong>and</strong>a).<br />

532 Law Advocacy for Women <strong>in</strong> Ug<strong>and</strong>a v Attorney General, Constitutional Petition Numbers 13/05 <strong>and</strong><br />

05/06 (2007) 1 (Constitutional Court of Ug<strong>and</strong>a).<br />

533 Z<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong>cludes adultery which is punishable by death with ston<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> fornication which attracts<br />

whipp<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!