19.01.2014 Views

sexual health and human rights in the african region - The ICHRP

sexual health and human rights in the african region - The ICHRP

sexual health and human rights in the african region - The ICHRP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eproductive autonomy. <strong>The</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> applicant began to be subjected<br />

to <strong>the</strong>se customs when she was only twelve years of age deserved a more<br />

deliberate <strong>in</strong>quiry on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> Court, not least because of <strong>the</strong><br />

prevalence of child marriages <strong>in</strong> many parts of Africa. Child marriages are<br />

not merely a violation of liberty <strong>and</strong> self determ<strong>in</strong>ation. <strong>The</strong>y also impact<br />

adversely on <strong>sexual</strong> <strong>and</strong> reproductive <strong>health</strong>.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> applicant had argued that her arrest, detention <strong>and</strong> imprisonment for<br />

bigamy follow<strong>in</strong>g conviction by <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Court of First Instance were<br />

arbitrary <strong>and</strong> unlawful. Whilst hold<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> applicant has been<br />

enslaved under <strong>the</strong> customs of Wahiya <strong>and</strong> Sadaka, <strong>the</strong> Court <strong>in</strong>explicably<br />

found that <strong>the</strong> applicant had been lawfully arrested <strong>and</strong> deta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>and</strong><br />

imprisoned <strong>in</strong> connection with <strong>the</strong> crime of bigamy. <strong>The</strong> court said:<br />

Detention is arbitrary if it is not founded on any legal basis. In this particular case <strong>the</strong><br />

applicant’s arrest <strong>and</strong> detention <strong>in</strong>tervened to implement a judicial decision rendered by<br />

<strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al court. <strong>The</strong> decision whe<strong>the</strong>r ill-founded or not, constitutes a legal basis that<br />

is not for <strong>the</strong> Court to assess. 84<br />

1.10 Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African Development Community<br />

[24] Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African Development Community (Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African Community): <strong>The</strong><br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African Community was formed <strong>in</strong> 1980 as <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African<br />

Development Co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation Conference. Initially, <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African<br />

Community was formed as a sub-<strong>region</strong>al body for reduc<strong>in</strong>g economic<br />

dependence on economically dom<strong>in</strong>ant South Africa. At <strong>the</strong> time, South Africa<br />

was a pariah state on account of its apar<strong>the</strong>id system of government. <strong>The</strong><br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African Development Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Conference became <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

African Development Community <strong>in</strong> 1993, 85 <strong>and</strong> its members <strong>in</strong>clude countries<br />

that are part of <strong>the</strong> sample of this study. It comprises of 15 countries, namely<br />

Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, Madagascar,<br />

Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swazil<strong>and</strong>,<br />

Tanzania, Zambia <strong>and</strong> Zimbabwe.<br />

[25] Though primarily concerned with economic <strong>and</strong> political <strong>in</strong>tegration, <strong>the</strong><br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African Community is also concerned with <strong>the</strong> achievement of uniform<br />

protection <strong>and</strong> promotion of <strong>human</strong> <strong>rights</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa Community has<br />

shown some signs of be<strong>in</strong>g a progressive sub-<strong>region</strong>al body <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>and</strong>/or adoption of <strong>human</strong> <strong>rights</strong> <strong>in</strong>struments that directly or<br />

<strong>in</strong>directly impact on <strong>sexual</strong> <strong>health</strong>. Among <strong>the</strong> objectives of <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African<br />

Community Treaty is alleviat<strong>in</strong>g poverty, enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> quality of<br />

84 Hadijatou Mani Koraou v Republic of Niger, para 91.<br />

85 O Osode ‘<strong>The</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African Development Community <strong>in</strong> Legal Historical Perspective’ (2003) 28<br />

Journal for Juridical Science 1.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!