pdf. 4MB - Ku-ring-gai Council
pdf. 4MB - Ku-ring-gai Council
pdf. 4MB - Ku-ring-gai Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.3 PUBLIC CAR PARKING & UNDERGROUNDING<br />
OF AT-GRADE CAR PARKING<br />
<strong>Council</strong> has a number of public car parks in the town centres, with most<br />
spaces typically having 2 hour parking restrictions to ensure turnover<br />
while providing shopper convenience. Shorter term parking (1/2 or 1<br />
hour) is usually located on the kerbside, and is intended for much shorter<br />
stay and quick access. Other privately owned but publicly available<br />
parking (such as the in Gordon Centre or St Ives Shopping Village) have<br />
notional time limits, including 3 hour limits.<br />
Figure 3.3-1:<br />
Typical street parking sign.<br />
Most <strong>Council</strong> car parks exist due to the surrounding older type strip<br />
shops/offices in the town centres generally not being able to provide<br />
parking on-site to service their needs and those of their customers.<br />
However, as redevelopment of the town centres occurs, new on-site<br />
parking would need to be provided to cater for the parking needs of<br />
the development. As this on-site provision increases, the role and<br />
importance of large at-grade <strong>Council</strong> car parks would be slowly<br />
diminished. New on-site parking would also help to address longer term<br />
(employee) parking which is currently transferred to surrounding roads<br />
and competes directly with commuters, residents and other longer stay<br />
users.<br />
In 2006, <strong>Council</strong> resolved to ensure there is no loss of publicly available<br />
car parking in the town centres. It follows that if (subject to the outcomes<br />
of the reclassification of <strong>Council</strong> lands) <strong>Council</strong> car park sites were to be<br />
redeveloped, the existing publicly available car parking would have to be<br />
replaced, probably by undergrounding. However, as indicated in the Arup<br />
background study, the parking needs of the town centres would be met<br />
if redeveloped sites provided for their own parking needs on-site, which<br />
could gradually diminish the long term need for <strong>Council</strong> car park sites.<br />
There is therefore scope to reduce the quantity of car parking needed<br />
to be undergrounded. It is likely that the cost to underground public car<br />
parks where mixed use or other development is proposed above (such<br />
as the Wade Lane car park) would be considered through a planning<br />
agreement with a developer and as a result, these projects were not<br />
included in the <strong>Ku</strong>-<strong>ring</strong>-<strong>gai</strong> Town Centres Development Contribution Plan.<br />
For shorter stays, it is envisaged that the bulk of on-street parking would<br />
be retained, with new roads and public domain improvements offe<strong>ring</strong><br />
the opportunity to increase on-street parking. Depending on demand,<br />
it may be necessary to extend the times that period parking operates<br />
in key streets (and car parks) on weekends (eg Village Green Parade,<br />
Grandview Street, St Johns Avenue, Rohini Street, Lindfield Avenue, Hill<br />
Street) to ensure adequate turnover on Saturdays and Sundays.<br />
New roads are appropriate projects for development contributions due<br />
to the benefits to vehicle access and circulation, as well as pedestrian/<br />
bicycle permeability and the additional on-street public parking they<br />
provide (where appropriate). Some roads are critical to the traffic<br />
improvements being proposed in various town centres. These have been<br />
identified in the <strong>Ku</strong>-<strong>ring</strong>-<strong>gai</strong> Town Centres Development Contribution<br />
Plan.<br />
p-16<br />
<strong>Ku</strong>-<strong>ring</strong>-<strong>gai</strong> Town Centres Parking Management Plan 2010