Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.2. German Firm Case Studies<br />
In the following chapters, I will describe and analyse the findings from the interviews<br />
conducted in German firms and from collected statistical and collective bargaining material.<br />
The key question is whether those inner-firm policies and regulations allow a prolongation<br />
of working life. More specifically, I will distinguish between internalising and externalising<br />
measures as depicted in section 4.1.1. I will also answer the hypotheses formulated in the<br />
initial sections of this work.<br />
In the next sections, I will deal in detail with the overall shape of HRM in the studied<br />
German firms, with recruitment practice, further training, health management (including the<br />
integration and rehabilitation of incapacitated workers) and with firm-level policies guiding<br />
the end of work life. That division follows the structure of section 4.1. It is orientated<br />
towards personnel policy areas rather than towards instruments or goals (an example of the<br />
latter is Frerichs/Bögel 2008); a similar structure was applied by the European Foundation<br />
(Naegele/Walker 2003). I did, however, not include dimensions like working time,<br />
promotion, career development, personnel deployment, teamwork, or work organisation,<br />
except where it touches upon the issue of health management or further training. Reasons<br />
for omittance are that I regard the acquisition of competences and the preservation of good<br />
health as core determinants of prolonged working life in line with the workability model of<br />
Ilmarinen (2005: 133). Moreover, the qualitative interviews did not allow to cover all those<br />
aspects in detail.<br />
In each HRM field, I will typify ´good practice´ examples. I will resort here to policy<br />
recommendations given in literature (see section 4.1.) and develop my own analytical grid<br />
of ´good practice´. Afterwards, I will elaborate on the reaction of firms and of the workforce<br />
(as perceived by my interviewees) to legislative changes, and describe the mode of<br />
negotiations on HRM issues between the management and employee representatives.<br />
In the final section, I will repeat the results of Hypotheses testing. I will also construct a<br />
typology of firms in my sample which will specify, on the one hand, the criteria of ´good<br />
practice´ applied in the sections dealing with recruitment, training, health management and<br />
exit policy. That dimension will visualise the degree to which those policies are<br />
internalising, resp. externalising older workers. The other dimension will visualise the<br />
degree to which those policies are elements of an elaborate age management strategy or,<br />
v.v., symptoms of ´muddling through´ and rather reactive, short-term policies.<br />
111