11.03.2014 Views

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

criteria of what jobs are they are supposed to accept. Job placement in the regular and not in<br />

the subsidised labour market has acquired a higher priority.<br />

An expression of the activation trend is the programme „Initiative 50 plus“ launched in<br />

2002 with the Job-AQTIV Act and subsequent acts and revived in 2006. It introduced<br />

´integration grants´ (wage costs subsidies for employers when hiring unemployed<br />

´50pluses´), qualification vouchers for persons in SME, facilitated opportunity to conclude<br />

temporary contracts with persons aged 52 and over 21 , and earnings subsidies granted to<br />

´50pluses´ who take up a lower-paid job (BmAS 2006c). Factually, only the integration<br />

grants generated positive effects on the recruitment chances of older unemployed,<br />

predominantly in Eastern Germany (Zwick 2006: 161-2). Other measures were largely<br />

unknown by the firms, and even by job placement officers (BmAS 2006b: xviii-xix;<br />

Eichhorst 2006a: 108).<br />

Another form of intervention of the German state in the regulation of the work contract<br />

is its legislation on Flexible Working Time Regulations from 1998. With this law, the<br />

legislator created incentives to install life-time work accounts. They may be inter al. used<br />

for training purposes, for gradual or early exit. In contrast to long-time work accounts, lifetime<br />

work accounts are protected against insolvency.<br />

Compared to other OECD countries, Germany has a strong legal and collectively agreed<br />

protection against dismissals (OECD 2005a: 116-8). Since 1969, it covers workers with an<br />

unlimited work contract and with a work history of at least six months in firms with more<br />

than ten (till 2004, more than five) employees; the period of notice rises with tenure. Those<br />

workers can only be dismissed for indiscipline or due to operational reasons in connection<br />

with a looming insolvency or mass redundancies. In a redundancy payments scheme drawn<br />

for this reason, the employer has to consider the criteria of age, seniority, dependants, severe<br />

disability and efficiency. The last criterion, introduced in 2004, has opened the way to shield<br />

younger workers from dismissals and exposed older workers to that risk, as the criterion of<br />

´job prospects´ closely connected to age was simultaneously dismantled (Thora 2004: 11).<br />

21 After an appeal by the European Court of Justice on grounds of ageism, the legislator included the rule that<br />

the worker had had to be unemployed for at least four months and the temporary contract may not be extended<br />

beyond five years.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!