11.03.2014 Views

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With regard to personnel policy towards older workers, I proposed two contradictory<br />

hypotheses (see section 2.2.). I supported hypothesis 2A with regard to recruitment (older<br />

applicants are treated as a ´problem group´) and employee exit (older workers are used as a<br />

buffer for personnel adjustments). Hypothesis 2B is supported with regard to health and<br />

integration management (the policy differs with regard to persons with diminished work<br />

capacity, but is not directly linked with the age criterion). Neither hypothesis was supported<br />

in the field of further training, as no uniform pattern of employer action has emerged in<br />

terms of integration or exclusion of older workers.<br />

Hypothesis 3 (see section 2.2.) is not supported in the field of recruitment, further<br />

training and health and integration management and supported in the field of exit policy<br />

only with regard to the economic position of the firm. As it seems, the economic standing of<br />

the firm is a driver for externalisation strategies towards older workers at the end of the<br />

working life. Respective strategies are intensified when a necessity to conduct labour<br />

shedding arises. That confirms the firm-structural approach (Kohli et al. 1983) and Mares´<br />

(2001) assumption derived from a combination of the ´varieties of capitalism´ and ´varieties<br />

of welfare state regimes´ approach. The firm-structural approach helps explain why there is<br />

a discrepancy between the policy of state actors and its insufficient trickling-down to<br />

company level. Also my firm examples demonstrated that employer action runs contrary to<br />

the policy direction set by the Polish state actors and by the EU.<br />

The age structure of the workforce does not determine corporate policies towards older<br />

workers in neither field of company policy (however, that could not be assessed with regard<br />

to further training due to incomplete information). Firms with older and younger age<br />

structures are uniform in their mostly externalisation-orientated or negligent policy towards<br />

older workers.<br />

Hypothesis 4 (see section 2.3.) is supported with restrictions. Only the intermingling of<br />

structural and institutional factors brings about the specific pattern of early exit in Poland.<br />

The incentives in the pension system play a role as pull levers of early exit to a greater<br />

extent in periods of downsizing. Moreover, even if the pull factors lose their power (e.g.<br />

diminishing level of pre-retirement benefits), push factors move older workers to leave the<br />

firm in a rather involuntary way, although with some decision latitude given by the<br />

employer (workers decide to exit early for fear of unemployment should early exit vehicles<br />

deteriorate even further). Another push factor with interacts with the institutional factors is<br />

the nature of work – persons working in health-harming conditions are more willing to exit<br />

early (as I assume, even in the absence of an entitlement to early retirement in ´special´<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!