Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
policy, as they have experience on the old, communist system of further training which was<br />
regarded in some respects as better by both the employee representatives and management.<br />
Trade unions have little impact on issues of health management, and are not very<br />
committed to that issue. At national level, Brown et al. (2001: 254) even reached the<br />
conclusion that trade unions in Poland „oppose investments into occupational health as<br />
competing with their primary concerns such as employment security, compensation, and<br />
social benefits“.<br />
A special role had fallen to trade unions in the process of privatisation of state-owned<br />
enterprises (Towalski 2003; Gąciarz/Pańków 1996; Siewierski 1993). I will remark on it to<br />
the degree that it concerned personnel reductions and early exit.<br />
An exemplary case of the influence of trade unions on the privatisation process forms<br />
Firm PL-9. In 1992, the firm was commercialised, which is a preliminary stage of<br />
privatisation. Due to ensuing restructuring, the trade unions in the firm put pressure on the<br />
Ministry to release the CEO, and consented to privatisation by a Western European<br />
investor. In exchange for the agreement, the workers received 15 per cent of shares and a<br />
privatisation premium and seven-year employment guarantees starting from mid-1998.<br />
During that time, only voluntary exit of workers were possible, and a hiring freeze was<br />
instituted.<br />
Employment guarantees were also introduced in three other firms, ranging from two till<br />
five years. Such guarantees were however only possible if the firm had gone through the<br />
state of commercialisation, i.e. was owned by the state. A Social Plan in case of mass layoffs<br />
– which were possible in the absence of employment guarantees – could be negotiated<br />
only in firms with a majority shareholder. In firms where that had not been the case (e.g. in<br />
Firm PL-<strong>12</strong> before acquisition by the US American owner, or in Firm PL-13), personnel<br />
reductions were especially severe, and the power of trade unions to steer the process was<br />
lowest.<br />
In some firms, trade unions suggested to release workers with an entitlement to social<br />
security benefits in the first place, even against the resistance of older workers. The<br />
motivation was to secure workplaces for remaining workers, to create vacancies for<br />
younger applicants, and to lower the average age of the workforce.<br />
Such examples of co-management are sign of the change in labour relations at firm level<br />
from confrontation to negotiation (Siewierski 1993: 144). Trade unions have reached the<br />
204