Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Dissertation_Paula Aleksandrowicz_12 ... - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Moreover, “pensions of persons working shorter periods but receiving higher wages were<br />
higher than for those who worked longer and received lower wages, even if they had paid<br />
the same total contribution when calculated for the whole working life” (Chłoń-Domińczak<br />
2002: 138). The qualifying period for the pension under the old system was 20 years for<br />
women and 25 years for men.<br />
Reforms in 1997 and 1998 changed the defined-benefit pay-as-you-go one-pillar old-age<br />
pension system to a multi-pillar one based on defined contributions, where the first PAYG<br />
pillar was based on Notional Defined Contributions (see Chłoń et al. 1999 for a<br />
comprehensive reform report). 25 The new pension rules affect birth cohorts from the years<br />
1949 onwards. A novelty was the introduction of a fully-funded, obligatory second pillar<br />
and of voluntary third pillar pensions. Non-contributory benefits were removed from the<br />
system and left to tax financing. A qualifying period of 20 (women), respectively 25 (men)<br />
years is required only for the minimum pensions. The pension level now reflects earnings<br />
and contributions accumulated in the whole work career. The benefits are actuarially<br />
adjusted, so that “[e]ach additional year of work and contributions will be rewarded with a<br />
clear increase in the net present value of pension benefits, as the accumulated notional<br />
capital increases and life expectancy decreases” (Chłoń et al. 1999: 23). This should incite<br />
individual workers to prolong their working life. However, the reformers did not succeed in<br />
pushing through a uniform, flexible retirement age of 62-65 years; therefore women may<br />
still retire at the age of 60.<br />
People born between 1.1.1949 and the end of 1968 could decide whether they wanted to<br />
stay in the reformed NDC first pillar or whether they wanted to split their pension<br />
contribution between the first and the second pillar. For my studies at establishment-level,<br />
the old, defined-benefit pension system is of importance, as first old-age pensions from the<br />
new system will commence only in 2009. Moreover, due to transitory rules, persons entitled<br />
to early retirement under the old system may retire earlier till the end of 2008 (or even later,<br />
if they have completed the required contribution period before 1.1.1999) with favourable<br />
adjustments in the pension formula (Janiszewska-Wyszyńska 2007; Chłoń et al. 1999: 43).<br />
However, the new old-age pension system is of relevance when determining personnel<br />
policy in the mid- and long-term span and for persons who are not entitled to early<br />
25 The NDC system is an accounting mechanism which individualises the link between benefits and<br />
contributions and credits all lifetime earnings. It differs from a defined contribution plan in fully-funded<br />
schemes insofar as the fund exists only virtually and capital is not built up, as it is still a PAYG system relying<br />
on the intergenerational contract (Börsch-Supan 2003).<br />
72