13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CP13</strong>/6<br />

<strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Firms</strong><br />

2.<br />

Application to investment firms<br />

Introduction<br />

2.1 This chapter:<br />

• explains the overall outcome of <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> investment sector firms;<br />

• provides a summary of key derogations in CRR and the Directive by type of firm;<br />

• explains the impact of <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> AIFM and UCITS management companies; and<br />

• reminds firms of the implications of the new Common Reporting (COREP) and <strong>Financial</strong><br />

Reporting (FINREP) framework.<br />

Overall outcome of <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> investment sector firms<br />

2.2 This CP concerns changes that have been made by <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong>. There have not been changes in<br />

the initial scope, which is determined by MIFID. However, the definition of ‘investment firms’ in<br />

the CRR has been amended, so that there will be specific prudential requirements <strong>for</strong> different<br />

types of investment firms that carry out MIFID investment activities.<br />

2.3 At the same time, it is important to note that <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> was designed <strong>for</strong> banks yet it is also<br />

applied to investment firms in the EU. This means that the overall outcome of <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

investment firms results in placing more requirements on investment firms.<br />

2.4 However, this is mitigated through a combination of provisions – either derogations or national<br />

discretions – that effectively dis-apply certain requirements in the CRR and/or in the Directive<br />

<strong>for</strong> different types of investment firms. In line with our overall approach to <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> transposition,<br />

our proposals have made use of discretions – where allowed – and in accordance with the<br />

FCA’s own objectives.<br />

2.5 The Commission is required to review the appropriateness of the whole prudential regime<br />

<strong>for</strong> all firms 3 carrying out investment activities under MIFID (including local firms, specialist<br />

commodities firms, other firms exempted from the definition of ‘investment firm’ in article 4.1(2)<br />

(c) of the CRR) by the end of 2015. We there<strong>for</strong>e wish to minimise changes in the meantime<br />

and focus policy ef<strong>for</strong>ts upon this review to secure an appropriate EU-wide solution that caters<br />

<strong>for</strong> all the different types of investment sector firms.<br />

2.6 The following diagram seeks to illustrate, in a simple way, the overall outcome of <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

our population of investment sector firms:<br />

3 Other than credit institutions.<br />

14 July 2013<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!