13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FCA 2013/xx<br />

4.3.35 G In accordance with articles 181(1)(b) and 182(1)(b) of the EU CRR, where<br />

the estimates appropriate <strong>for</strong> an economic downturn are more conservative<br />

than the long run average, the FCA expects the estimate <strong>for</strong> each of these<br />

parameters to represent the LGD or CF expected, weighted by the number of<br />

defaults, over the downturn period. Where this is not the case, the FCA<br />

expect the estimate to be used to be the expected LGD or CF, weighted by the<br />

number of defaults, over a representative mix of good and bad economic<br />

periods (see articles 179, 181 and 182 of the EU CRR).<br />

Assignment to grades or pools<br />

4.3.36 G To demonstrate that a rating system provides <strong>for</strong> a meaningful differentiation<br />

of risk and accurate and consistent quantitative estimates of risk, the FCA<br />

expects a firm, in assigning exposures to grades or pools within a rating<br />

system, to have regard to the sensitivity of the rating to movements in<br />

fundamental risk drivers (see article 171 of the EU CRR).<br />

Definition of default: identification of obligors<br />

4.3.37 G The FCA expects that if a firm ordinarily assigns exposures in the corporate,<br />

institution or central government and central bank exposure classes to a<br />

member of a group, substantially on the basis of membership of that group<br />

and a common group rating, and the firm does so in the case of a particular<br />

obligor group, the firm should consider whether members of that group<br />

should be treated as a single obligor <strong>for</strong> the purpose of the definition of<br />

default in article 178(1) of the EU CRR.<br />

4.3.38 G The FCA does not expect a firm to treat an obligor as part of a single obligor<br />

under IFPRU 4.3.37G if the firm rates its exposures on a standalone basis or<br />

if its rating is notched. (For these purposes a rating is notched if it takes into<br />

account individual risk factors or otherwise reflects risk factors that are not<br />

applied on a common group basis.) Accordingly if a group has two members<br />

which are separately rated, the FCA will not expect that the default of one<br />

will necessarily imply the default of the other.<br />

Definition of default: days past due<br />

4.3.39 G IFPRU 4.3.4G contemplates that the FCA expects to exercise its discretion to<br />

permit the days past due component of the definition of default at 180 days<br />

<strong>for</strong> exposures secured by residential or SME commercial real estate in the<br />

retail exposure class, as well as exposures to public sector entities (PSEs).<br />

4.3.40 G In certain circumstances, a firm may wish to use a 90-day definition of<br />

default, <strong>for</strong> example, where application of a 180-day definition of default<br />

would potentially inhibit a joint decision being reached. The FCA will assess<br />

the option used by the firm as part of its assessment of the IRB approach.<br />

Definition of default: unlikeliness to pay in distressed restructuring<br />

4.3.41 G The FCA expects a credit obligation to be considered as a distressed<br />

restructuring if an independent third party, with expertise in the relevant area,<br />

would not be prepared to provide financing on substantially the same terms<br />

and conditions (see article 178(2)(d) of the EU CRR).<br />

Page 67 of 197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!