13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CP13</strong>/6<br />

<strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Firms</strong><br />

<strong>CRD</strong><br />

article<br />

FCA<br />

Handbook<br />

reference<br />

–if existing<br />

discretion<br />

Area of national discretion<br />

Does the<br />

FCA intend<br />

to exercise<br />

the relevant<br />

discretion from<br />

1 January 2014?<br />

88(1) (e) An individual will not be allowed to simultaneously<br />

carry out the CEO and chairperson function within<br />

an institution, unless explicitly authorised to do so by<br />

the FCA.<br />

88(2) Discretion <strong>for</strong> Member States to allow a firm that is not<br />

considered ‘significant’ not to establish a nominations<br />

committee.<br />

91 FCA may authorise members of the management body<br />

to hold one additional non-executive directorship.<br />

The number of directorships a member of the<br />

management body can hold at the same time shall take<br />

into account individual circumstances and the nature,<br />

scale and complexity of the institution’s activities.<br />

95 FCA may allow a firm that is not considered ‘significant’<br />

not to establish a remuneration committee.<br />

127(3) In the absence of equivalent supervision, the FCA<br />

may require the establishment of a financial holding<br />

company or mixed financial holding company which<br />

has its head office in the EU, and apply the provisions<br />

on consolidated supervision to the consolidated<br />

position of that financial holding company or the<br />

consolidated position of the institutions of that mixed<br />

financial holding company.<br />

129(2) This allows member states to exempt SMEs from the<br />

capital conservation buffer requirement, provided that<br />

they do not pose a risk to the financial stability of the<br />

respective member state.<br />

130 This allows member states to exempt SMEs from the<br />

capital conservation buffer requirement provided that<br />

they do not pose a risk to the financial stability of the<br />

respective member state.<br />

Yes<br />

Yes (subject to<br />

HMT’s decision)<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes (subject to<br />

HMT decision,<br />

if the FCA were<br />

to be made<br />

the designated<br />

authority, then<br />

based on our<br />

analysis on the<br />

definition of<br />

significance (see<br />

Chapter 5), we<br />

would be minded<br />

to propose that<br />

we exercise these<br />

discretions)<br />

Q29: Do you agree with our proposed approach to the<br />

national discretions? If not, please indicate the areas of<br />

national discretion where you disagree with the FCA<br />

proposal stating your reasons and alternative proposal.<br />

Q30: Do you believe that there are any articles in the Directive<br />

or in the Regulation –not covered in Annex 3 – which<br />

would require the FCA to exercise its discretion as a CA?<br />

If so, what articles would you suggest and why?<br />

90 July 2013<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!