13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Firms</strong><br />

<strong>CP13</strong>/6<br />

6.11 These proposals amount to keeping the ‘status quo’ pending the Commission’s review of an<br />

appropriate prudential regime <strong>for</strong> firms in the investment sector by end 2015 which is the<br />

proper place to secure a more permanent ‘level playing field’ across the EU.<br />

Applicable provisions from the FCA Handbook<br />

Table 11: It shows the relevant Sourcebooks and chapters from the FCA Handbook<br />

that would be applicable to BIPRU firms as a result of our proposals:<br />

Sourcebook<br />

GENPRU<br />

BIPRU<br />

SYSC<br />

Applicable Chapters<br />

1, 2 and 3 (and relevant transitionals)<br />

1 to 5, 7 to 9, 11, 13 and 14 (and relevant transitionals). 12 (firms need<br />

to check the relevant application provisions)<br />

<strong>Firms</strong> need to check the application provision of the relevant chapter<br />

Existing waivers<br />

6.12 Any existing waivers under GENPRU and BIPRU <strong>for</strong> these firms would continue to be in effect<br />

after 1 January 2014 since the rules would continue to apply.<br />

Reporting<br />

6.13 Under our proposals BIPRU firms would continue using GABRIEL to submit FSA0xx reporting<br />

templates because COREP and FINREP are designed to report on <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> elements.<br />

Firm impact<br />

6.14 We estimate that approximately 1000 firms could benefit from our proposals in this chapter.<br />

6.15 Applying our proposals mean no overall change in costs or benefits <strong>for</strong> BIPRU firms since we<br />

would be keeping the ‘status quo’ subject to the outcome of the EU wide review of the whole<br />

prudential regime by 2015.<br />

6.16 We believe our pre-consultation discussions indicated initial support <strong>for</strong> these proposals, as<br />

they avoid the cost of changes <strong>for</strong> all concerned, while maintaining protection <strong>for</strong> consumers<br />

and market integrity, pending the EU-wide review. Under these proposals firms would not<br />

need to implement unnecessary changes to systems and capital that otherwise they might have<br />

had to undo in a few years time – depending on the outcome of the EU review.<br />

6.17 There is a further consequence of the change to the definition of ‘investment firm’ in article<br />

4.1(2)(c) outlined above in paragraph 6.3, which may impact some existing firms that currently<br />

benefit from being treated as ‘exempt CAD firms’ in our current Handbook. This is where a firm<br />

carries out only MIFID services and activities (1) reception and transmission of orders in relation<br />

to one or more financial instruments and/or (5) investment advice (but not (2) execution of<br />

orders on behalf of clients and/or (4) portfolio management).<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> July 2013<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!