CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CRD IV for Investment Firms
CP13/6
Q15: Do you agree with our proposal not to exercise the
exemption in article 400(2)(k) of the Regulation? If not,
please explain the reasons why not.
Q16: Do you agree with this approach in relation to articles
395 and 396 of the Regulation? If not, please explain
why not and propose alternative approaches and the
rationale for those approaches.
Q17: Do you agree with the approach of allowing firms to
report a quarterly leverage ratio as opposed to a three
monthly ratios averaged for the quarter? If not, please
explain why not and propose alternative approaches and
the rationale for those approaches.
Q18: Do you agree with our proposal for an interim list of
recognised exchanges pending the ESMA ITSs including
our approach for third country stock exchanges? If
not please propose changes to the list explaining the
rationale why.
Q19: Do you agree that this approach in relation to the
discretion in article 99 of the Regulation is proportionate
and risk based? If not, please explain why not and
propose alternative approaches and the rationale for those
approaches.
Q20: Do you agree with our proposal to exercise the discretions
in articles 124(2) and 126(3) of the Regulation to maintain
a risk weight of 100% for exposures to UK commercial real
estate, as it is currently the case? If not, please explain why
not and propose alternative approaches and the rationale
for those approaches.
Q21: Do you agree with our proposal to publish an objective
criteria identifying which firms these policies refer to?
If not, please explain why not and propose alternative
approaches and the rationale for those approaches.
Q22: Do you agree that the combination of these metrics
sufficiently capture the size, internal organisation and
nature, scope and complexity of an investment firm’s
activities? If not, please explain why not and propose
alternative approaches and the rationale for those
approaches.
Q23: Do you agree that these thresholds are appropriate?
If not, please explain why not and propose alternative
approaches and the rationale for those approaches.
Financial Conduct Authority July 2013
93