13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CP13</strong>/6<br />

<strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Firms</strong><br />

5.6 A cumulative distribution <strong>for</strong> each impact factor has been produced based on data currently<br />

reported by firms to the FCA and ordered from highest to lowest. This allows the FCA to<br />

assess the marginal impact of imposing each requirement on one more firm. For example,<br />

the marginal impact analysis of the balance sheet assets impact factor shows that 68% of<br />

all balance sheet assets are held by only 39 solely FCA regulated <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> firms. The marginal<br />

benefit of imposing requirements due to the impact resulting from the amount of assets held<br />

on the balance sheet rapidly declines after this point.<br />

5.7 The cut-off point will fall within a marginal impact range. The lower bound of this range is<br />

based on the point at which the slope of the curve falls below 100% (i.e. the point at which it<br />

could be argued that the marginal cost rate is greater than the marginal benefit rate, where the<br />

gradient is 1). The upper bound is based on the point at which the slope of the curve falls below<br />

50% (gradient of 0.5). Within this range the cut-off point is based on the percentage of firms<br />

captured; so <strong>for</strong> steep curves the number will tend to be less than that <strong>for</strong> shallower curves.<br />

5.8 Broadly, we aim to capture the firms that constitute at least the top two thirds of the total<br />

market <strong>for</strong> each indicator. However, due to the broader distribution of fees and commission<br />

income across firms, we have lowered that threshold.<br />

5.9 While this proposal applies at an individual firm basis, the FCA reserves the right to apply the<br />

criteria at a consolidated level where deemed appropriate.<br />

Market analysis<br />

5.10 The graphs below show the cumulative distribution <strong>for</strong> each of the impact factors, the upper<br />

and lower bound and the proposed thresholds:<br />

• Figure 2: Cumulative total assets: 39 firms account <strong>for</strong> 68% of the total assets within<br />

the market, of which the firm accounting <strong>for</strong> the lowest value of assets holds approximately<br />

£530 million of assets. We there<strong>for</strong>e propose that the threshold <strong>for</strong> total balance sheet<br />

assets is £530 million.<br />

% of total assets<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

Gradient = 0.5 which ≈ 68% (£530 mn)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

Gradient = 1 which ≈ 53% (£1.1 bn)<br />

30<br />

20<br />

15 <strong>Firms</strong> 39 <strong>Firms</strong><br />

10<br />

Captured Captured<br />

0<br />

1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91<br />

Number of <strong>Firms</strong><br />

113<br />

102<br />

91<br />

79<br />

68<br />

57<br />

45<br />

34<br />

23<br />

11<br />

0<br />

£ Billion<br />

44 July 2013<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!