13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CP13</strong>/6<br />

<strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Firms</strong><br />

CRR<br />

article<br />

FCA<br />

Handbook<br />

reference –<br />

if existing<br />

discretion<br />

Area of national discretion<br />

Does the<br />

FCA intend<br />

to exercise<br />

the relevant<br />

discretion from<br />

1 January 2014?<br />

162 BIPRU<br />

4.4.67R,<br />

BIPRU<br />

4.4.81R,<br />

BIPRU<br />

4.6.54R<br />

Further criteria <strong>for</strong> IRB permissions:<br />

162(1) - <strong>for</strong> Foundation IRB firms, the FCA may give a<br />

direction to a firm to use a specified Maturity <strong>for</strong> each<br />

exposure among those set out in art. 162(2)<br />

162(2)(h) - FCA may give a firm using an internal<br />

model to calculate credit valuation adjustment (CVA)<br />

authorisation to use its own estimate of effective credit<br />

duration as maturity (M).<br />

162(2)(i) - A firm, with an IMM Permission and a<br />

specific market risk internal model permission <strong>for</strong><br />

traded debt instruments shall set M to 1 in the <strong>for</strong>mula<br />

laid out in Art 153(1), provided that the firm can<br />

demonstrate to the FCA that its internal model <strong>for</strong><br />

specific risk associated with traded debt positions under<br />

Art 383 contains effects of rating migrations.<br />

Yes<br />

164<br />

and<br />

199<br />

BIPRU<br />

4.6.54R<br />

164(2) - FCA may decide whether unfunded credit<br />

protection is eligible in support of an individual<br />

exposure or pool of exposures.<br />

164(5) - FCA must assess periodically and, at least,<br />

annually whether the minimum Loss Given Default<br />

(LGD) set out in paragraph (4) <strong>for</strong> exposures secured by<br />

residential and commercial real estate are appropriate.<br />

The FCA may increase these minima on the basis of<br />

financial stability considerations.<br />

Yes (we will<br />

publish this data<br />

at a later date)<br />

166(8) BIPRU<br />

4.4.37R -<br />

9(a) first<br />

paragraph,<br />

(b), (c) and<br />

(d), BIPRU<br />

4.6.44R<br />

- 9(a) last<br />

paragraph,<br />

BIPRU<br />

4.8.29R<br />

- 9(c) last<br />

paragraph,<br />

BIPRU<br />

4.4.45R -<br />

9 (e)<br />

170(4) BIPRU<br />

4.6.11R<br />

178 BIPRU<br />

4.3.57<br />

Permission to use own estimates of conversion factors<br />

(art. 166(8)(e)): an advanced IRB firm may use its own<br />

estimates of conversion factors across the different<br />

product types listed in subparagraph (a) to (d) of art.<br />

166(8) with the prior consent of the FCA.<br />

FCA may exempt a firm from the obligation to include<br />

‘delinquency’ as a risk driver <strong>for</strong> assigning exposures<br />

to grade or pools, provided that delinquency is not<br />

material <strong>for</strong> a given exposure.<br />

Under the IRB approach, this article defines a period<br />

of 90 days past due as a default, with the possibility of<br />

this period being extended to 180 days <strong>for</strong> exposures<br />

secured by residential or retail SME CRE, as well as<br />

exposures to PSEs should the FCA deem appropriate.<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

80 July 2013<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!