13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Firms</strong><br />

<strong>CP13</strong>/6<br />

Partnership capital<br />

4.26 The CRR does not explicitly address issues around capital instruments <strong>for</strong> partnerships and<br />

limited liability partnerships (LLPs). However, article 26 of CRR the EBA is required to maintain<br />

a list of all eligible instruments that qualify as CET 1. Accordingly, we require a list of all<br />

instruments that are used by partnerships and LLPs to satisfy the CET 1 criteria outlined in<br />

article 28 of the CRR, in order that the FCA can in<strong>for</strong>m the EBA that we intend to accept such<br />

instruments as CET1 capital.<br />

Q12: If appropriate, please can you provide a list of all<br />

capital instruments used by partnerships and LLPs<br />

that, in your opinion, satisfy the criteria outlined in<br />

article 28 of the CRR?<br />

Internal models<br />

4.27 The solely FCA-regulated <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> population does not include many firms that use internal<br />

models to calculate credit, operational or market risk capital requirements. Most of the firms<br />

that do have permission to use an internal model do so as part of a consolidated permission<br />

through a PRA regulated parent undertaking. In such a case, while the FCA would have input<br />

in to the process whereby an internal model is approved or not approved, the process would<br />

be led by the PRA. 9<br />

4.28 The CRR text is more prescriptive than the CAD and BCD in its detail surrounding the granting<br />

of permission to use an internal model <strong>for</strong> calculating regulatory capital.<br />

4.29 Noting the small number of firms within the solely FCA regulated <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> population which<br />

use models, and the greater degree of detail within the CRR than has existed previously, the<br />

FCA proposes to keep guidance and rules regarding the use of internal models <strong>for</strong> calculating<br />

regulatory capital within the FCA Handbook to a minimum, except where we can carry across<br />

existing relevant guidance.<br />

4.30 This reflects the limited legal capacity of competent authorities to interpret a European<br />

regulation. The processes <strong>for</strong> our operational implementation will be communicated to firms<br />

separately, be<strong>for</strong>e the implementation of <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong>.<br />

4.31 Any firm considering applying to use an internal model should, in the first instance, approach<br />

their usual supervisory contact at the FCA. All model applications will be considered against the<br />

CRR text, and assessed on the individual merits of the application.<br />

Q13: Considering the legal constraints in respect of EU<br />

regulation and in the context of internal models, do you<br />

agree to our proposal to use guidance where appropriate<br />

while explaining the operational implications of the<br />

changes via targeted communications? If not, please<br />

explain why not and propose alternative approaches and<br />

the rationale <strong>for</strong> those approaches.<br />

9 Although the FCA would remain responsible <strong>for</strong> the application of the model at a solo level entity.<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> July 2013<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!